This case concerned the fact that four people had been quarantined by the Regional Health Authority. Of these, one had tested positive for COVID using a PCR test; the other three were deemed to have undergone a high risk of exposure. Consequently, the Regional Health Authority decided that all four were infectious and a health hazard, which required that they go into isolation. Court overruled citing several experts and previous cases regarding PCR tests being garbage. Some snippets from the court ruling:

“if someone is tested by PCR as positive when a threshold of 35 cycles or higher is used (as is the rule in most laboratories in Europe and the US), the probability that said person is infected is less than 3%, and the probability that said result is a false positive is 97%.”

The threshold cycles used in PCR tests in Canada is between 30 and 50 depending on province, which basically makes the reliability of the PCR test less than 3% and the false positive rate as high as 97% as well.

Court Conclusion:

“Given how much scientific doubt exists — as voiced by experts, i.e., those who matter — about the reliability of the PCR tests, given the lack of information concerning the tests’ analytical parameters, and in the absence of a physician’s diagnosis supporting the existence of infection or risk, there is no way this court would ever be able to determine whether C was indeed a carrier of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, or whether A, B and D had been at a high risk of exposure to it.”

For some reason, governments wont acknowledge this, wont talk about it, media wont speak about, mention it, cover it and no one in any position of authority in medicine or science with experience using this faulty "test" (it was originally designed to replicate material, not test for anything, even creator says its not a test) will question the entire scam they have going. Portugal is in the EU and this ruling should be huge for all countries there, yet no mention of it or discussion.