I didn't read the entire article, just a few lines.
You know how the argument against lockdowns is that Covid is killing old people with underlying health conditions that are close to dying anyway?
Have you used this argument before to support opening up the economy?
Well, along the same lines, when you administer a vaccine to 42,000 people
that are close to dying and 29 of them die shortly after they take the vaccine, can you really say that the vaccine killed them? Would they have died with or without the vaccine, anyway? Are the 29 deaths statistically relevant?
I'm not a die-hard pro-vaccine person. I'm not gonna get vaccinated. But I do want those most vulnerable to be vaccinated so that hospital capacity is no longer an excuse for a lockdown.
I didn't read the entire article, just a few lines.
You know how the argument against lockdowns is that Covid is killing old people with underlying health conditions that are close to dying anyway?
Have you used this argument before to support opening up the economy?
Well, along the same lines, when you administer a vaccine to 42,000 people that are close to dying and 29 of them die shortly after they take the vaccine, can you really say that the vaccine killed them? Would they have died with or without the vaccine, anyway? Are the 29 deaths statistically relevant?
I'm not a die-hard pro-vaccine person. I'm not gonna get vaccinated. But I do want those most vulnerable to be vaccinated so that hospital capacity is no longer an excuse for a lockdown.