posted ago by CanadianRighty ago by CanadianRighty +10 / -4

If there were a category of unvaxxed that were lower risk than a certain category of vaxxed, should those vaxxed people still be permitted to dine in restaurants while those unvaxxed are not permitted? If so please explain the scientific reason.

Comments (18)
sorted by:
tuchodi -8 points ago +2 / -10

There are people who are scientists and people who listen to scientists. I am one of the latter. You need to ask one of the former.

CanadianRighty [S] 11 points ago +11 / -0

Translation, you’re not intelligent enough to think for yourself

tuchodi -5 points ago +1 / -6

Are you one of those who think their powers of deduction are superior to a professional's education and experience? One of those "My ignorance is equal to your knowledge!" people?

CanadianRighty [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

No I think you're incapable of deductive reasoning and independent thought.

You literally need to be told what to think.

CanadianRighty [S] 7 points ago +7 / -0

Which scientists should I ask BTW? Only the ones you promote I suppose

tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

I'd be more inclined to listen to one with relevant education and experience. Who did you have in mind?

BritPedeMEGA 3 points ago +3 / -0

How abou these?

Dr. Mike Yeadon (Recently retired Chief Scientist at Pfizer)

Dr. Wolfgang Wudar (Chairman- Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe Health Committee )

Dr. Peter McCullough (internist, cardiologist, epidemiologist, Prof of medicine at Texas A&M College of Medicine)

Dr. Robert Malone (Salk Institute Molecular Biology and Virology -inventor of mRNA vaccines (and DNA vaccines. He also discovered lipid mediated and naked RNA transfection technologies.)

I'm sure others will suggest some. Hey, if you are lucky and in Texas sometime in the near future, maybe you can get some ivermectin from one of them if you come down with a future variant, Megatron 2 super deluxe pentium edition corona.

Bannonmeharder 3 points ago +3 / -0

Tuchodi will ignore. Vaxx shill is ignorant unless it’s On the Covid Broadcasting Corp

DoggyDawg 6 points ago +7 / -1

Uhhh… you listen to liberal media.

tuchodi -7 points ago +2 / -9

That doesn't qualify me to answer the question either.

DoggyDawg 9 points ago +9 / -0

No, i was responding to where you say you listen to scientists. That’s not true; you listen to select scientists, liberal-approved scientists.

Urallfucked -3 points ago +2 / -5

I wonder why there's no credible conservative antivax scientists 🤔

DoggyDawg 2 points ago +2 / -0

Huh? Conservatives are antivax? I’m antivax? You’re making mindless assumptions like CP24 is training you to do.

CanadianRighty [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because when a scientist reports something a leftist disagrees with they are labeled as a not credible and removed from the discourse.

Becasue that's how low IQ leftists think science works

tuchodi -5 points ago +1 / -6

select scientists

The 99.9%

The ones peddling the bullshit - sincere as they may be - tend to be ex-eye doctors (Rand Paul), chiropractors, philosophers, etc.

If you know any infectious disease experts who agree with you and make their living in the public health sector please let me know.

DoggyDawg 2 points ago +2 / -0

99.99% in your mind because you’re being actively prevented from hearing from them. Here’s just one example:

CanadianRighty [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Uhhh you're going to need to post a source for the 99.9% stat you referenced.

Bannonmeharder 2 points ago +2 / -0

Tuchodi is basically a faggot jab shill. He would parrot anything the government says as it can’t think for its self.