13
Comments (50)
sorted by:
5
CanadianRighty 5 points ago +5 / -0

No no no no NO! The vaccines are SAFE and EFFECTIVE.

12 year olds ARENT ALLOWED TO FLY WITHOUT IT (in canada) BECAUSE SCIENCE.

Also this is a free country and all my ideas are based on science alone not politics.

-Tuchodi

3
IamBACK 3 points ago +3 / -0

Clearly an unrelated coincidence. /s

hahaha

-5
tuchodi -5 points ago +4 / -9

So, about 360 million vaccinations, and 3500 deaths not linked to anything in particular, but OP claims while providing no proof that they have to be caused by the vaccines.

That's 0.001%, or one death in 130,000.

Compare that to the death rate from the virus which, at 1%, is a thousand times higher. See the 'Closed Cases' box at the top of this page: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/

Can they provide a link to the chart, so that we could go and read about it and 'do our own research'? Not a chance, because it's a picture from seven months ago that they copied from some web site somewhere.

They couldn't find the current version of that chart and provide a working link for us to read about it if their life depended on it. They're just spreading misinformation, that's all. Albeit with pretty pictures that they modify from https://imgflip.com.

Remember folks: there's a global pandemic on and people are going to die. All the science says people who are vaccinated don't get as sick and don't die as often: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Are+covid+vaccines+effective%3F&t=h_&df=m&ia=web

6
VaxedAndContagious1 [S] 6 points ago +8 / -2

Now, that Ontario is rolling out the fourth shot be prepared for the drastic increase in infection rates and sudden deaths in the vaccinated.. The summer of death for the double boosted. This is what happens with negative VE%. The vaccine helps the virus.

The Pfizer papers they tried sealing for 75 years, show that the mRNA shots causes immunosuppression for 7 days, the recipients suffered lymphopenia, the immune system is broken for a week. Like cancer patients, for a week after the shot. Which explains why 77% of Covid cases in ICU were fully vaccinated with their boosters this Christmas and, the freshly injected are now the majority ICU. It suppresses your immune system, and you catch anything you’re exposed to. And it gets worse with each shot. Sudden death is skyrocketing. And Tuchodi is LOVING every second of it.

-7
tuchodi -7 points ago +3 / -10

Blah, blah, and more unsupported blah.

You got a link to the current version of that old CDC chart in your post yet? Of course not. You couldn't find it on your own.

5
ChazzleDazzle 5 points ago +5 / -0

Give it up Turdochi. I just got over covid unvaccinated and it was an unremarkable viral illness. I can't believe people took 3 jabs for this.

9
VaxedAndContagious1 [S] 9 points ago +10 / -1

Congrats Chaz. You didn’t get the shot, so you have a functioning immune system.

Don’t worry about Tuchodi. She’s the only one between the three of us who admitted she knows nothing about science. She’s just here to post CDC tampered data and endorse Trudeau’s Nazi style Segregation. She hates anyone who wants to keep bodily autonomy, she hates anyone who is healthy and unvaccinated.

She knows Trudeau pre purchased 100 million mRNA doses of a vaccine that doesn’t work. And she agrees that he should fire anyone who refuses his Pfizer inventory.

Her obsessive compulsion to mislead the young and healthy to get vaccine assisted suicided is downright disturbing, and all her posts have been saved for the history books.

7
ThePopCan 7 points ago +7 / -0

Yeah bud. I've got shit lungs (pneumonia over 8 times) and breezed through the delta version of the CCP Virus. We fucked our civilization up over a mild flu.

-4
tuchodi -4 points ago +4 / -8

Good for you. A lot of people survive car accidents too.

6
VaxedAndContagious1 [S] 6 points ago +7 / -1

By refusing the experimental mRNA injection, Chazzle has a 100% chance of having no side effects, a 0% chance of dying from vaccine induced myocarditis, a 0% chance of dying from vaccine induced stroke, and he has a 99.87% chance of surviving Covid because he is immunocompetent due to the fact he is mRNA free .

I like those odds.
Remember Tuchodi, Math and Stats are not your strong suit. You said it yourself, you don’t have a science background, and you don’t know anything about immunology, medicine or biology, or the vaccine, … you’re just here to post propaganda.

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +2 / -8

Haven't heard anything about your expertise either, so we're even there.

The difference is that I post about science and reference science journals while you mostly post your own opinions with no support, and if you do provide any support it's almost always a picture of something with no links.

7
VaxedAndContagious1 [S] 7 points ago +8 / -1

science journals lol

-You reference tampered data, that the CDC admitted they revised and altered,

  • you know “unvaccinated” on the Ontario Dashboard includes fully vaccinated who are “undeclared status”, you pretend these hospitalized patients are unvaccinated

  • you endorse the firing of HEALTHY unvaccinated nurses - no science there

  • you endorse forcing back to work Covid infected fully vaccinated doctors and nurses who are PCR positive, spreading disease to the elderly and vulnerable - no science there

  • you endorse banning healthy vax free Canadians with a Negative PCR from leaving the country - no science there

  • you endorse putting healthy unvaccinated Canadians on a No Fly list no science there

  • you endorse fully vaccinated Covid infected passengers flying on a crammed plane NO SCIENCE THERE

  • you endorse the vaccine passport LOL NO SCIENCE THERE

  • you endorse forced government injections with no long term data - no science there, the data is unknown, informed consent is impossible

  • you endorse masks on healthy children and on healthy adults - no science there

  • you endorse quarantining the healthy, asymptotic - no science there

  • you claim the healthy unvaccinated spread a disease they don’t have - no science there

  • you endorse lifting travel and quarantine restrictions for the boosted and vaccinated who are sick, infected with Covid again, and PCR positive - NO SCIENCE THERE

Your science is fiction. And smart people are laughing at you Tuchodi.

-5
tuchodi -5 points ago +3 / -8

science journals lol

There's your problem. You laugh at science, then spew out a bunch of opinions about science while producing none. All you have is memes, pictures from flaky web sites, and the voices in your head.

6
VaxedAndContagious1 [S] 6 points ago +7 / -1

Translation: “I cannot for the life of me explain with logic and science why unvaccinated Canadians are put on a no Fly list, there is no science justifying Covid infected fully vaccinated PCR positive Canadians on a plane while banning the PCR negative Canadians, and there is definitely no logic or science behind forcing sick Covid infected nurses who are fully vaccinated back to work with the elderly while firing healthy PCR negative nurses. I admit this is illogical and have no reply and no explanation. I admit this makes no sense and it is in fact, political retribution”.

  • Tuchodi,
3
CanadianRighty 3 points ago +3 / -0

Since you’re talking statistics, how about the the statistical death risk variance between vaxxed and unvaxxed healthy 12 year olds.

You want healthy 12 olds barred from travel despite a zero risk.

I suspect you’re all for concentration camps.

You’re a true monster.

-8
tuchodi -8 points ago +1 / -9

As if death was the only thing to worry about.

I can see the logic of not putting unvaxxed people in crowded enclosed spaces full of people for hours at a time.

7
VaxedAndContagious1 [S] 7 points ago +7 / -0

You don’t want unvaccinated healthy, fit with no comorbidities people in enclosed spaces? Why? Explain with science.

Hospital occupation rates when stratified by age and comorbidities prove the elderly and the obese are the ones filling up hospital beds. Vaccine status is irrelevant.

Why do you endorse putting the elderly, the frail, and obese people who have very high hospitalization risk factors together on a plane, without PCR testing them.

Explain your logic.

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

Vaccine status is irrelevant.

So you say, despite all those quotes I gave you yesterday about the effectiveness of the vaccines. Your complete refusal to acknowledge that science says you should get vaccinated makes it difficult to move this conversation forward.

I'll just refresh your memory about what the trained and experienced people are saying:

"The risk of myocarditis following the mRNA vaccines has been evaluated by the US Food and Drug Administration, which concluded that the benefits of vaccination outweigh the risks and fully authorized the use of mRNA-1273 in persons 18 years or older and BNT162b2 in persons 16 years or older. In addition, BNT162b2 is authorized for emergency use in children 5 years or older.20,21 The European Medicines Agency concluded that the benefits of vaccination outweigh the risks and approved mRNA-1273 for use in persons 12 years or older and BNT162b2 for those 5 years or older.22,23 In addition, a comment published by the American College of Cardiology24 evaluated vaccine-associated myocarditis risk and concluded that the benefits of vaccination outweigh the risks. As of January 2022, there have been nearly 5.8 million deaths associated with COVID-19 worldwide since the start of the pandemic.25 All currently available SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines are highly effective against severe COVID-19 and provide some protection against transmission and infection."

What do you have apart from the voices in your head that says these people are wrong?

1
CanadianRighty 1 point ago +1 / -0

A person devoid of logic sees logic in the illogical. Typical leftist thinking.

Where is the data supporting your unscientific position?

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

I'm going to stick to OP's post and the facts that :

  1. the death rate from covid is a thousand times higher, and

  2. they can't provide a link to current data, just a picture of an old chart and no opportunity to read the source material ourselves.

As for links: there's the results of the duckduckgo search above, and the clear indication that the unvaccinated are taking up a disproportionate number of hospital and ICU beds (https://covid-19.ontario.ca/data). Why put them in a situation where they are more likely to become sick?

2
CanadianRighty 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why is Canada the only country in the world that bans unvaxxed children from domestic travel?

Is that based on science? If so what science is that based on?

You’re like the others in history, who chose to support the segregation of others.

It’s who you are, and who you’ll always be.

You made your bed.

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

Why is Canada the only country in the world that bans unvaxxed children from domestic travel?

Why do you not have a link to support that statement?

5
VaxedAndContagious1 [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

BlackFaceHitler:

“All healthy 12 year olds and older, have to get an experimental injection that puts them at risk of sudden death, they must take the injection at least twice, and accept that there is no long term safety data. Only by accepting these experimental shots, does a child preserve their basic human right to freedom of movement”.

https://travel.gc.ca/travel-covid/travel-restrictions/domestic-travel#mandatory

3
CanadianRighty 3 points ago +3 / -0

Sure do, I’ll share it once you share the link demonstrating the scientific rationale for your apartheid state.

1
CanadianRighty 1 point ago +1 / -0

That’s it.

There’s no science in your position so you use your deranged psychopathology to justify your crimes against humanity.

3
ChazzleDazzle 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's all bullshit. I'm unvaccinated I got over Covid quicker than everyone in my household that is double/triple jabbed.

My sister in law 3x jabbed is the one we all caught it from.

Fuck all these studies, they're bullshit. We don't need studies we have actually real-world evidence these vaccines if you can call them that are absolute trash.

The only possible argument in favor of them is giving them to people over 70 or anyone severely immunocompromised.