13
Comments (54)
sorted by:
7
CanadianRighty 7 points ago +7 / -0

No doubt these numbers are gamed, and the reality is even worse

5
VaxedAndContagious1 [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

100%.

Can confirm for Ontario reporting:

  1. unvaccinated patients who were admitted with a covid positive test, who are now testing negative, are still being reported as active Covid patients. It’s even specified on the dashboard
  2. the Ontario dashboard also says that fully vaccinated patients who got injected with CoronaVac/Sinovac, Sinopharm, Covaxin, Sputnik V, Sputnik Light, CanSinoBIO viral vectors, they are all reported as unvaccinated since these vaccines are not PHAC approved
  3. all vaccinated patients admitted for heart attacks and cardiac events the day after or 2 weeks after their mRNA shot: all reported as unvaccinated or not fully vaxed
  4. And all patients found unresponsive, altered status homeless, addicts, overdose patients, or patients who refuse to declare their status: all reported as “unvaccinated”

The stats are cooked.

-7
tuchodi -7 points ago +1 / -8

The stats are cooked

The stats aren't cooked, they're inaccurate. There are unique subsets of unvaccinated people: the ones who don't believe covid exists, the ones who figure "it's only a cold/the flu", the ones who figure "I'm young and healthy, I'll just ride it out". Most of these people are not going to get tested, so of course they won't show up in the stats.

Also: Another example of OP being unable to link to their sources. All they can do is post pictures they find on sketchy web sites.

7
CanadianRighty 7 points ago +7 / -0

Oh suddenly when the stats show something you don’t like they’re inaccurate?

Provide evidence for that.

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

I don't believe people in the United States, who do not believe covid is dangerous, go and get get tested for it. You are perfectly free to believe that if you want to.

6
VaxedAndContagious1 [S] 6 points ago +6 / -0

Your unsupported opinion has no value.

The National Data confirms:

THE FULLY VACCINATED HAVE THE HIGHEST RATE OF COVID INFECTIONS

FACT

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

Awwwww. And this just after you said unsupported opinions were worthless. I thought we had had a breakthrough.

5
VaxedAndContagious1 [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

The stats aren't cooked, they're inaccurate.

You’re ok with stats being reported inaccurately? Explain.

In response to hard 4 facts, obtained on the Ontario Dashboard website, Tuchodi/Urallfucked replies with an opinion.

Your opinion has no value Tuchodi,/UrallFucked

There were more unvaxed tested, but you don’t understand science, research or methodology, so this is another embarrassing self-owner you once again.

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

You’re ok with stats being reported inaccurately?

You're the one that's claiming they mean something, not me.

Tuchodi/Urallfucked

Ah! Now I see where all those delusional statements are coming from. Can't imagine two people disagreeing with your unsupported opinions, eh?

Tuchodi,/UrallFucked

Hahahahahahaha :-)

There were more unvaxed tested

They say, with no support, but that's OK because only their opinions count.

7
VaxedAndContagious1 [S] 7 points ago +7 / -0

Why are you ok with stats being reported inaccurately and with the fully vaccinated being reported as unvaccinated?

EXPLAIN

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

You're the one using faulty stats to support your unsound opinion. Explain it yourself.

5
VaxedAndContagious1 [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

You said, quote: “the stats aren't cooked, they're inaccurate”.

Explain why you’re ok with the fully vaccinated being falsely reported as unvaccinated?

4
CanadianRighty 4 points ago +4 / -0

She expects us to provide evidence, yet she refuses

3
VaxedAndContagious1 [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Lol why did you delete your opinion?

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

Another unsupported statement.

Or are you referring to the post I couldn't make because .win said "Comment threads can't go that deep."? I had to make a new post about that.

2
CanadianRighty 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why don’t you provide backup for your support of the apartheid?

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

Why don’t you provide backup for your support of the apartheid?

Why don't you provide evidence of this apartheid you think you see?

1
CanadianRighty 1 point ago +1 / -0

You want me to provide evidence your side is not allowing unvaccinated people to travel without any evidence whatsoever?

2
CanadianRighty 2 points ago +2 / -0

Another example of Truchodi refusing to provide any evidence whatsoever for her apartheid against children.

You’re violating their human rights in a whim.

Pure evil.

-5
tuchodi -5 points ago +1 / -6

apartheid against children

I think you were going to provide some links that would tell us what you're talking about.

4
CanadianRighty 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think it’s up to you to provide a link to the science behind the unvaccinated travel bans.

I’m waiting

Where is the evidence

Where are the links?

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

I think it’s up to you to provide a link to the science behind the unvaccinated travel bans.

By now you know I think it's up to you to support your claims first. The idea of being obligated to research any unsupported claim made here in OmegaCanada doesn't appeal to me.

I see you've dropped the part about Canada being the only place in the world that's doing this.

3
bobbydriscolsgoat 3 points ago +3 / -0

The question should always be "does 'not vaccinated' include only those who have taken no shots" or are they gaming the numbers by including the fake 14 day unvaxed period

3
bobbydriscolsgoat 3 points ago +3 / -0

https://www.walgreens.com/businesssolutions/covid-19-index.jsp

Source: page 3.

The real kicker is they overtest unvaxed and over represented infection by using CDC terminology for unvaxed. Typical lying liberals

1
-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

Like I said: there are lots of reasons why unvaccinated people will not show up to get tested.

5
VaxedAndContagious1 [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

The unvaccinated don’t get sick at the same rate as the fully vaccinated.

As the testing data stats prove. The fully vaccinated are all getting INFECTED WITH COVID at a MUCH HIGHER rate.

Keep seething CovidNazi

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

The unvaccinated don’t get sick show up to get tested at the same rate as the fully vaccinated.

Fixed that for you.

3
VaxedAndContagious1 [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

The unvaccinated are not getting infected Tuchodi. They’re not getting INFECTED with Covid as much as the fully vaccinated are.

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

The only way they know they're infected is if they get tested, and there are several cohorts among the unvaccinated who won't get tested, so they don't show up in the stats Walgreens' charts are based on.

You don't show up as infected if you don't get tested.

5
VaxedAndContagious1 [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

Your unsupported opinion has no value.

The facts remain the same. FULLY VACCINATED ARE AT HIGHER RISK OF COVID INFECTION.

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

FULLY VACCINATED ARE AT HIGHER RISK OF COVID INFECTION.

Only because unvaccinated people are less likely to show up in the statistics because they are less likely to get tested.

Meanwhile, in the hospitals:

28 February 2022 "in the six-month period July to December 2021, the estimated relative risk of admission to Jersey General Hospital due to clinical COVID for those aged 40 and over was 3.5-14.4 times greater in those who had received less than two doses of COVID vaccine than in those who received two or more doses of the vaccine." https://www.gov.je/Health/Coronavirus/CoronavirusDocuments/R%20COVID%20Cases%20Vaccine%20Status%20Report.pdf

Nov. 25, 2021 "Unvaccinated people are about six times more likely to test positive than vaccinated people, nine times more likely to be hospitalized, and 14 times more likely to die from COVID-related complications" https://www.webmd.com/vaccines/covid-19-vaccine/news/20211124/unvaccinated-14-times-more-likely-to-die-from-covid

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

Your unsupported opinion has no value.

You need a scientific study to tell you that people who don't believe covid is dangerous are not likely to choose to get tested for it?

How about one to prove the sky is blue?