16
Comments (33)
sorted by:
6
CanadianRighty [S] 6 points ago +6 / -0

Although Tuchodi doesn't provide evidence for her assertions, I will:

http://www.bccdc.ca/health-professionals/data-reports/covid-19-surveillance-dashboard

6
VaxedAndContagious1 6 points ago +6 / -0

The US National Data confirms:

THE FULLY VACCINATED HAVE THE HIGHEST RATE OF COVID INFECTIONS.

In Ontario:

  • THE COVID VACCINE FAILED 85% OF HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS.

  • THE COVID VACCINE FAILED 75% OF THE ICU COVID INFECTED PATIENTS

In Israel:

  • 80% of serious illness COVID INFECTIONS in the ICU are TRIPLE VACCINATED.

https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/321674

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

Google Prof. Jacob Giris yourself & read his comments.

6
VaxedAndContagious1 6 points ago +6 / -0

Go get boosted Tuchodi! You might be joining the other 80% ICU population who are also boosted though.

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

I hope you don't gamble. You have no concept of odds. The other 20% in your ICU are coming from the 10% of the population that's unvaccinated. https://covid-19.ontario.ca/data

3
VaxedAndContagious1 3 points ago +3 / -0

Get your Booster Tuchodi!!!

-4
tuchodi -4 points ago +1 / -5

?

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +2 / -8

You're going to need more than one month's worth of data from less than 0.001% of the world's population.

6
VaxedAndContagious1 6 points ago +7 / -1

you’re going to need more data.

Says the rat who supports an experimental injection that claimed to be safe and effective after a 4 month trial, in 40,000 subjects.
That’s 0.000005% of the world population.

Safe and effective, based on a 4 month trial.

You are a FRAUD

-5
tuchodi -5 points ago +2 / -7

And you present nothing to show us that your opinions and numbers have any basis in truth.

6
VaxedAndContagious1 6 points ago +6 / -0

Why have you not read the Pfizer clinical trial papers they attempted to seal for 75 years? It’s in Pfizers own words. Is it because it’s above your reading comprehension level. You need CNN and CTV to dumb it down and give you false adjusted summaries?

You were injected with the Pfizer biotechnology Tuchodi, so it’s in your interest to read the clinical trial information they attempted to hide from you.

If you do read it, you will at least learn, 2 years after the fact, that you accepted their experimental injection, without informed consent. You will learn why so many PHDs, immunologists and vaccinologists refused the injection.

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

Pfizer clinical trial papers ... 2 years after the fact.

You're living in the past. There have been billions of Pfizer doses given. Got any current data?

so many PHDs, immunologists and vaccinologists refused the injection.

So you say. Can you prove it?

6
VaxedAndContagious1 6 points ago +6 / -0

The vaccine clinical trial data that Pfizer tried to hide from you, was ordered unsealed by the courts.

-5
tuchodi -5 points ago +1 / -6

Billions of Pfizer vaccines delivered, occasional serious reactions VS six million deaths from the virus.

6
VaxedAndContagious1 6 points ago +6 / -0

You fell for a scam. You took an experimental injection based on the 95% relative vaccine efficacy, after a 4 month trial, in 0.000005% of the pop. Now, after 2 years, the absolute efficacy is 2%.

And you fell for it.

I wouldn’t be on here bragging about this.

-4
tuchodi -4 points ago +2 / -6

the absolute efficacy is 2%.

Show me your source for that and I'll show you what's wrong with it.

1
DoggyDawg 1 point ago +1 / -0

No he won’t. This is not supposed to happen in a province of 5 million people if the vaccine efficacy claims hold true… EVER. Look up the law of large numbers.

-7
tuchodi -7 points ago +1 / -8

The fact that all the institutions qualified to comment on the pandemic are being ignored by so many anonymous nobodies doesn't bode well for the future.

-7
tuchodi -7 points ago +1 / -8

This is not supposed to happen

Says someone on the Internet that no one knows. Got a link?

1
DoggyDawg 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don’t need a link. Basic stats. Very basic. Take a basic stats course. I’m not explaining math here, although i pointed you in the right direction- law of large numbers. Study it. It will help with your innumeracy.

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +2 / -8

I’m not explaining math here

Exactly. You're not even trying.

"Trust me" doesn't work when you could be Sergei or Chen Li.

1
DoggyDawg 1 point ago +1 / -0

Math holds true no matter the situation. Doesn’t need to be explained here. You either understand math or you don’t.

I’ll help you, though… 5 million people is a huge sample size. It’s not an outlier.

-7
tuchodi -7 points ago +1 / -8

You either understand math or you don’t.

You either understand infectious diseases, global pandemics, and relevant public health policy, or you don't.

What are your qualifications there? Are you claiming training and experience in all of those fields too? No.

You are willing to argue that the math expertise you claim to have allows you to contradict experts in fields in which you have no standing.

1
DoggyDawg 1 point ago +1 / -0

Math.