Comments (11)
sorted by:
-7
10
VaxedAndContagious1 10 points ago +10 / -0

Disclaimer for Outcomes by Vax 1:

  • “Age standardized rate”: is a fictitious summary. This data manipulation is not real information in the sense of empirically observable data. It describes, how the hospitalization and death rate would be, if the reference population and the standard population were equal, thus abstracting from age structure effects.

  • All statistics are from the year 2021 when no one was considered fully vaccinated

  • ”Unvaccinated definition”: Vaccinated population who are < 21 days of receiving Covid vaccine dose.

  • Hospitalization definition: All screenings, all populations in outpatient care, ambulatory services, observed or admitted for issues unrelated to COVID-19 or related to COVID-19.

I would delete this post if I were you Tuchodi.

6
VaxedAndContagious1 6 points ago +6 / -0

Or don’t delete it.

Let the lurkers see your fraud.

-6
tuchodi [S] -6 points ago +2 / -8

Not a single link to back your bullshit up.

Just the voices in your head.

6
VaxedAndContagious1 6 points ago +7 / -1

Your opinions has no value

-7
tuchodi [S] -7 points ago +1 / -8

And yours do?

-5
tuchodi [S] -5 points ago +2 / -7

Disclaimer for Outcomes by Vax 1

I would supply a link if I were you. So far it looks like you're just making stuff up.

“Age standardized rate”: is a fictitious summary. This data manipulation is not real information

Like that. Hard to imagine that coming from anyone but you.

All statistics are from the year 2021

You wish. But it says quite clearly the data on that chart are for Apr. 10 - May. 07, and the rest of the graphs on the "Outcomes by Vax 1" default to Dec 1 21 - Apr 1 22

Unvaccinated definition

It takes 2 or 3 weeks for a body to respond fully to the vaccine, but you have to ignore that to support your opinions.

Hospitalization definition

That's another quote that would benefit from a link, otherwise it might be assumed that it doesn't have anything to do with the charts we're discussing.

7
VaxedAndContagious1 7 points ago +7 / -0

At least u/CanadianRighty posted a link that includes a 1) date and 2) n=all population. You did not, no date, and a fictitious population LOL!

  1. “Age standardized rate definition”: is a fictitious summary. This data manipulation is not real information in the sense of empirically observable data. It describes, how the hospitalization and death rate would be, if the reference population and the standard population were equal, thus abstracting from age structure effects.

  2. The fully vaccinated are again included in your definition of unvaccinated.

  3. You posted an adjusted population based on computer modeling and old 2021 data. CanadianRighty also posted the current April May 2022 n=all data, which contradicts this fictitious modeling and confirms how gullible and uninformed you are. You don’t understand math.

Your arts and gender studies diploma failed you here.

-5
tuchodi [S] -5 points ago +2 / -7

What link? All I see is opinions.

6
VaxedAndContagious1 6 points ago +7 / -1

You are so defeated.

The more you stand by fictitious data, the more lurkers will understand to what degree you are a rat propagandist.

-5
tuchodi [S] -5 points ago +2 / -7

aaaannnnddd more opinions.

You can say anything you want - and do - but you don't back it up.