But you don't understand odds, do you? For you it's all black and white, 100% gold plated guarantees of 100% protection, or nothing.
"The FDA determined the known and potential benefits of the vaccine for the prevention of COVID-19 outweigh the known and potential risks for individuals 18 years of age and older for whom other authorized or approved COVID-19 vaccines are not accessible or clinically appropriate, and for individuals 18 years of age and older who elect to receive the Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine because they would otherwise not receive a COVID-19 vaccine." https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19/janssen-covid-19-vaccine-frequently-asked-questions
does not have basic knowledge to explain the difference between ‘absolute risk’ and ‘relative risk’. (thus explaining her gullibility)
and keeps posting fraudulent studies that contain 1) fictitious or estimated outcomes 2) suspected covid cases that get counted as confirmed covid cases, 3) hides the covid infection rates after Dec 2021 and excludes recent breakthrough cases in the fully vaccinated after Dec 2021. 4) only uses data from sept 2020 to Aug 2021 when EVERYONE unvaccinated
You're full of opinions aren't you. Just little old you arguing with the results of all those research studies. Too bad you have no science on your side.
It's all about the odds.
But you don't understand odds, do you? For you it's all black and white, 100% gold plated guarantees of 100% protection, or nothing.
"The FDA determined the known and potential benefits of the vaccine for the prevention of COVID-19 outweigh the known and potential risks for individuals 18 years of age and older for whom other authorized or approved COVID-19 vaccines are not accessible or clinically appropriate, and for individuals 18 years of age and older who elect to receive the Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine because they would otherwise not receive a COVID-19 vaccine." https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19/janssen-covid-19-vaccine-frequently-asked-questions
The above opinion is written from the same gullible individual who:
fell for the claims of safe and effective after a 4 month clinical trial
links unscientific methodologies and fraudulent data from a 2021 study where “SUSPECTED covid cases” were counted as PCR confirmed cases. See here -> https://omegacanada.win/p/15Hv76wnOj/x/c/4OYXXQImXR2
does not have basic knowledge to explain the difference between ‘absolute risk’ and ‘relative risk’. (thus explaining her gullibility)
and keeps posting fraudulent studies that contain 1) fictitious or estimated outcomes 2) suspected covid cases that get counted as confirmed covid cases, 3) hides the covid infection rates after Dec 2021 and excludes recent breakthrough cases in the fully vaccinated after Dec 2021. 4) only uses data from sept 2020 to Aug 2021 when EVERYONE unvaccinated
You're full of opinions aren't you. Just little old you arguing with the results of all those research studies. Too bad you have no science on your side.
You’re the only one here posting 1) outdated, 2) fraudulent data and 3) pretending suspected and probable Covid Cases are confirmed. LOL
You’re the only one who accepts this fraud and is ok with it.
YOUR UNSCIENTIFIC & POLITICAL BIAS IS SHOWING TUCHODI. You’re getting exposed for the RAT PROPAGANDIST YOU ARE.
These are your opinions, and as you say: opinions are worthless.
Go get you some science.