13
Comments (34)
sorted by:
4
VaxedAndContagious1 4 points ago +4 / -0

Experimental mRNA Injections: the leading cause of coincidences and sudden death in the young and healthy.

-9
tuchodi -9 points ago +2 / -11

the leading cause of coincidences and sudden death in the young and healthy.

We're just supposed to take your word for it?

4
VaxedAndContagious1 4 points ago +5 / -1
  • ”Politico, Politifact and Snopes Twitter accounts tells me it’s true and tell me it’s ok to think it’s true”

  • ”Critical thinking is dangerous if Snopes and Politifact doesn’t agree”

~ Tuchodi, uneducated propagandist

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +2 / -8

It's pretty sad when your only recourse is to make stuff up.

1
Plaid_Avenger 1 point ago +1 / -0

Where's the MSM? Why they're on their way to the bank to cash their Trudeau cheques, if you listen hard you can still hear them laughing.

-9
tuchodi -9 points ago +1 / -10

Hard to see any specifics on Twitter and he doesn't seem to have put anything up at Western Standard yet. Does he mention anything that isn't spelled out by the government?

https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/diseases/coronavirus-disease-covid-19/vaccines/safety-side-effects.html

https://health-infobase.canada.ca/covid-19/vaccine-safety/summary.html

9
CanadianRighty [S] 9 points ago +9 / -0

You admit 0.0% is the risk to children of death from covid, yet you advocate restricting their movement if they haven’t received the injections, at your master Justin Trudeau’s whim.

It’s a fact that you would put the lives of children at risk in an attempt to protect adults. Reminds me of the Mayans and child sacrifice.

You’re a truly evil wretch.

7
VaxedAndContagious1 7 points ago +7 / -0

What is the long term data for experimental mRNA in infants. ?

This is how you know Tuchodi is pure evil.

-8
tuchodi -8 points ago +1 / -9

0.0% is the risk to children of death from covid

That would only be true if no children had died. I know you aren't claiming that no children have died.

you advocate restricting their movement

Children younger than 12 years, 4 months have always been able to travel. You probably mean teenagers.

You’re a truly evil wretch

You may be reading too many comic books.

6
CanadianRighty [S] 6 points ago +6 / -0

“That would only be true if no children had died. I know you aren't claiming that no children have died.”

  • 0.0% is from health Canada, you’ve interacted with that data you slimy liar.

“Children younger than 12 years, 4 months have always been able to travel. You probably mean teenagers.”

-Teenagers are children by definition retard. You want their rights taken away at Justin Trudeau’s political whim for a 0.0% risk.

Just like your Liberal masters youre always lying.

Eat shit evil Liberal cunt.

-8
tuchodi -8 points ago +1 / -9

Say it.

Say out loud, here, that no children have died from covid.

You want their rights taken away

That's a twisted way of looking at it. I want the advice of public health experts followed.

5
CanadianRighty [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

Repeat after me Tuchodi “health Canada data advertises that 0.0% of 12 - 18 year olds have died of covid.”

Will you admit the fact that the vaccines can cause permanent injury and death to 12 - 18 year olds?

You evil sick monster.

-7
tuchodi -7 points ago +2 / -9

So you refuse to acknowledge that over 50 people under 20 have died from covid in Canada. https://health-infobase.canada.ca/covid-19/ See Figure 7

Fine. You do you.

vaccines can cause permanent injury and death to 12 - 18 year olds

It's a global pandemic, so death and injury are unavoidable. Where is your proof that the risk of injury from the vaccines is greater than than the risk of injury from the virus?

7
CanadianRighty [S] 7 points ago +7 / -0

0.0%

The risk of covid to 12 - 18 year olds is 0.0% according to the government of Canada. Full stop.

0.0%

Is your minuscule brain capable of understanding what 0.0% means?

Where is your proof the vaccine lowers the risk for 12 - 18 year olds below 0.0%?

YOURE THE ONE WHO ADVOCATES FOR MANDATES AGAINST PERSONAL BODILY AUTONOMY YOU SICK FUCK, THE BURDEN OF PROOF IS ON YOU, RETARD.

Inject yourself with a million doses (god please do), leave the rest of us the fuck alone.

Jesus Liberals like Tuchodi are morons.

It's time we ask ourselves, do we continue to tolerate these people?

5
Bannonmeharder 5 points ago +6 / -1

Get boosted. We are waiting for you to get AIDS

5
DoggyDawg 5 points ago +5 / -0

Does he mention anything that isn't spelled out by the government?

Are you asking this because you’re confident that nobody will read through the link?

Here are just a few that he mentioned that aren’t spelled out in the government site you linked to:

  1. HELLP syndrome
  2. Severe cognitive issues
  3. General long-term sickness
  4. Huge growth in stomach
  5. Dizzines
  6. Long-term cardio issues
  7. Fibroids in uterus
  8. Retinal occlusion
  9. Hearing loss
  10. Death
7
VaxedAndContagious1 7 points ago +7 / -0

Ask Tuchodi to list the long term data for experimental mRNA in infants.

-8
tuchodi -8 points ago +1 / -9

Are you asking this because you’re confident that nobody will read through the link?

Nope. I'm asking because all I see is partial screen caps of messages. That's still all I see. If there's a link to an article or a list, well, I guess I don't use Twitter enough to be able to find it.

4
DoggyDawg 4 points ago +4 / -0

They’re obviously anecdotes. But you asked.

Many people get illnesses with or without the vaccines. Neither you nor i can tell which of these were caused by the vaccine. Some are coincidences. Some are not.

However, there is a positive correlation with these types of injuries following covid vaccine. Right now, you cannot question vaccine injuries, lest you get cancelled. In time, that will no longer be the case. We’ll get the full picture in a few years when it’s once again safe to report on real numbers when it comes to vaccine injuries.

Right now, i believe the vaccine injury numbers are much higher than reported. You do not.

But, then, i answered your question and you don’t like the answer… yes, he points out to many more adverse reactions than are listed on Canada’s adverse reactions list. And, you imply that the guy is lying because he posts “screen caps.” This is Twitter, where you post in a manner to appease short attention spans.

-7
tuchodi -7 points ago +1 / -8

you cannot question vaccine injuries, lest you get cancelled

Only a handful of doctors have been sanctioned by their professional associations, and most - if not all - of them have brought it on over unapproved treatments. As of January seven in Ontario: https://globalnews.ca/news/8524589/ontario-physicians-investigation-covid-19/, eight in the US: https://www.politico.com/news/2022/02/01/covid-misinfo-docs-vaccines-00003383

i believe the vaccine injury numbers are much higher than reported. You do not.

What I believe is that there's a global pandemic happening and injuries are unavoidable, and further that the risk of serious, life-altering injuries is lower with the vaccines than with the virus.

i answered your question and you don’t like the answer

Not at all. It looks to me like you're more willing to read those partial pictures of messages than I am.

7
VaxedAndContagious1 7 points ago +7 / -0

POLITICO?

You forgot to list your SNOPES experts!!

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

It's pretty sad when your only recourse is to make stuff up.

4
DoggyDawg 4 points ago +4 / -0

I answered your question. You didn’t like the answer, so you attacked how the guy presented his findings.

-5
tuchodi -5 points ago +1 / -6

Somebody is overly sensitive. I freely admit that I don't have the patience to decipher partial images of text messages. If there's a link to a clearer presentation of the messages he's talking about I can't find it. My hat's off to you for wading through it.

4
DoggyDawg 4 points ago +4 / -0

You still don't like that someone answered the question that you didn't think you'd be called out on, eh?