12
Comments (18)
sorted by:
5
ChazzleDazzle 5 points ago +5 / -0

I bet it's as temporary as they said inflation was going to be

4
CanadianRighty 4 points ago +4 / -0

Tuchodi is comfortable with this, so your body her choice.

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

From the paper: "T3 evaluation demonstrated overall recovery. Semen volume and sperm motility were not impaired. ... Long-term prognosis remains good." https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/andr.13209

7
VaxedAndContagious1 [S] 7 points ago +7 / -0
  1. SCIENTIFIC FACT #1 IN THE ABOVE ARTICLE: The mRNA injections lowers sperm count and lowers male fertility..

  2. SCIENTIFIC FACT #2: No data yet on sperm counts after mRNA booster doses. That data is unknown. No data for alert count after repeated Booster shots. “Prognosis” if boosted or after cumulative boosters is unknown.

  3. What T3 is Tuchodi. Explain, in medical terms, go:

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7
  1. Temporarily

  2. Yes. The future is unknown. All the future. In your quest for guarantees against the future you should try tarot cards, crystal balls, Ouija boards, palm readers, etc. Good luck.

  3. T3 is spelled out in the paper. Bring it up and use Ctrl-F to search for it.

7
VaxedAndContagious1 [S] 7 points ago +7 / -0

Your gender studies diploma failed you here.

  • If you don’t even know what T3 is and what it does in the human body why are you posting about it?

  • Chemotherapy lowers sperm count. The article confirms the mRNA injections lowers sperm count, few drugs do, chemotherapy does and anabolic steroids do. All three injectables also cause liver disease and heart arrhythmias.

And you want to inject this in to infants. You are a sick fuck.

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

T3

You really do need to read that paper.

As for the rest, you're a known fiction writer who makes stuff up on a whim. Maybe you know what you're talking about, maybe you don't.

But it doesn't seem to be worth losing sleep over if the effect is temporary.

6
VaxedAndContagious1 [S] 6 points ago +6 / -0
  • Short term Chemotherapy is so toxic it causes temporary hair loss, long term chemo, repeated chemo injections and prolonged use of chemo causes permanent hair loss, nothing to lose sleep over right Tuchodi. Along with mRNA boosters, I hereby mandate you to get repeated long term chemo injections, for a cancer you won’t get, your hair loss will be “temporary” because the data on short term use of chemo indicates hair loss is temporary. Get your chemo injections now Tuchodi!! it’s to prevent clogging the cancer ward Tuchodi, better start those chemo injections immediately

  • I understand you’re ashamed of your lack of education but constant deflecting when challenged on a subject matter that is above your IQ only signals how dumb you are.

  • What is T3 Tuchodi, and why are you unable to explain what it does?

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

Short term Chemotherapy

Is this post about chemotherapy? No. As much as you wish it was, it is not. You're using it as a platform to talk about chemotherapy, though, for some reason.

T3

Every time you mention it you look dumber. Please go and read the paper and see what it says about T3 before you bring it up again.

5
VaxedAndContagious1 [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

Your obsessive compulsive diagnosis is on full display tonight.

You obsessively edit your comments.

You obsessively comment

You obsessively think your uneducated opinion matters.

When challenged on a subject matter that is above your IQ, you obsessively repeat a meaningless deflection. Spotlighting even more your ignorance. This is embarrassing for you. You don’t have a clue what T3 is or if it’s even related to sperm count. This makes you a laughing stock.

Everyone here sees you’re uneducated and deranged.

No one cares what a deranged sick fuck thinks.

1
livinginaclownworld 1 point ago +1 / -0

Shouldn't individuals have known that their fertility was impaired for several months? And couples trying to get pregnant spending thousands on IVF may be affected by boosters which are not presented in the study.

How can this be forced as a condition of employment when we are still learning about new side effects that lasted for several months? I understand your intentions may be pure Tuchodi, but much is still unknown. Where there is unknown, there is risk. Where there is risk, there should be a choice.

I understand long term prognosis remains good, but if it didn't remain good? 'Safe and effective' was presented as scientific dogma but we have new studies going on still that challenge that conclusion.

Your unwillingness to allow others to have a different opinion on medical choice is disturbing.

6
VaxedAndContagious1 [S] 6 points ago +6 / -0

Tuchodi wants to inject infants and toddlers with experimental mRNA because old people and fat people are at high risk of illness and at high risk of hospitalization.

When you tell her that 1. Obesity, and 2. Old Age are the top predictors for severe illness and that vaccine status is irrelevant at this point, she knows it’s true, but she gnashes her teeth, seethes and robotically demands every healthy man woman and child get injected with unknown side effects.

She will obsessively defend a vaccine that currently has negative VE, death and myocarditis as side effects, and dismiss the vaccine injured and deaths, because she is politically driven. That’s as close to psychopathy as it gets.

As previously stated. The stupid and hysterical are driving Liberal policies.
Tuchodi is a constant reminder just how low the Liberal party has fallen.

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

Your unwillingness to allow others to have a different opinion on medical choice is disturbing.

Your concerns would have more justification if there wasn't global pandemic going on. So many of the posts here seem to ignore that.

If someone having a different opinion than yours disturbs you you should probably stay out of these forums.