Comments (3)
sorted by:
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

Here's another example of V&C1 twisting the tale. V&C1 says the health facility admitted "they were wrong to mandate the shots", but the court case was about the hospital's blanket policy dis-allowing religious exemptions.

As a result of the court case the hospital will now consider each request for a religious exemption individually.

The case was about religious exemptions, not vaccine mandates.

You have to double-check everything V&C1 tells you. https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/legal-regulatory-issues/northshore-reaches-10-3m-settlement-in-vaccine-mandate-case.html

VaxedAndContagious1 [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

Always on the defensive Tuchodi. And so easily triggered. This has to be your stupidest post yet. Trying to correct facts that are undisputed.

Lol no one here cares about your personal opinion.

We can’t wait until Trudeau mandates your 4th and 5th government boosters Tuchodi!!, you will be forced to submit to more RNA altering injections with unknown fatality data. Lol.

Nothing will make me happier than knowing you will be forced to submit to more Murderna shots.

tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

Trying to correct facts that are undisputed.

The only fact is that the suit was about religious exemptions. Anyone who reads your post - and I invite them to - can see for themselves: "The group claims NorthShore violated workers' religious autonomy by dismissing religious exemptions"

Reporting it to be about mandates is so typical of you.