24
Comments (11)
sorted by:
6
bobbydriscolsgoat 6 points ago +6 / -0

Everyone with half a brain knew the shots were only effective at what they were made for - gene therapy to cause livers to create new dna - dna that often leads to new cancers.

These were well disclosed in early studies and suppressed by "trust the science" cult followers of Pfizer.

-7
tuchodi -7 points ago +1 / -8

You're just learning that boosters are required?

5
VaxedAndContagious1 [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0
  • Oh look now Tuchodi admits the first two are massive failures, but now claims Canadians are “REQUIRED” to get injected with more RNA altering shots that failed the elderly and most vulnerable, and that gives healthy people heart disease. In Tuchodi’s personal uneducated opinion, Canadian are “REQUIRED” to be guinea pigs.

  • Only the gullible and uneducated fell for the high efficacy lie last year. It was only you Tuchodi who lied on Omega and claimed that the experimental injections were over 90% effective. No one else believed the high effectiveness lie. Only you propagated that lie.

  • You admit the booster is not protecting the elderly from hospitalization and death. You admit the boosted are DYING at HIGHER RATES than the double injected.

  • GO BOOST YOURSELF TUCHODI!

-8
tuchodi -8 points ago +1 / -9

V&C1 is all butthurt because they can't be guaranteed that they don't have to worry about covid. They say "Guarantee me that I won't get touched by this global pandemic or you're all a bunch of lying bastards trying to kill me."

Take pity on them.

1
Pegases 1 point ago +1 / -0

do you not remember all the talking heads promising that taking the vaccine meant you wouldn't get covid? I don't remember a single person saying the vaccine was 20% effective at 6 months

then they tried to blame the unvaccinated for the virus spreading. lol

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

the talking heads promising that taking the vaccine meant you wouldn't get covid?

Show me one vaccine trial that said it was 100% effective. You can't. Science never said that.

they tried to blame the unvaccinated for the virus spreading

For some variations of the virus that was true. "Before the emergence of the B.1.617.2 (delta) variant of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), vaccination reduced transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from vaccinated persons who became infected" https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2116597

1
Pegases 1 point ago +1 / -0

actually the vaccine trial killed all the animals, but they allowed them to be shipped out anyway. they still said it was 100% effective.

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

the vaccine trial killed all the animals

What makes you think that?

1
Pegases 1 point ago +1 / -0

sorry I got the details slightly wrong, The trial administrator killed all the animals up to 52 days into testing

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03275-y.pdf

however

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2021/04/no_author/dr-lee-merritt-in-animal-studies-after-being-injected-with-mrna-technology-all-animals-died-upon-reinfection/

What happened is all animals died… but they didn’t died of the “vaccine”. What they died from what used to be called “immune enhancement” and now they call it “antibody dependent enhancement” (ADE)

5
Gerned 5 points ago +5 / -0

You're a piece of shit, fuck you