Comments (8)
sorted by:
Bannonmeharder 7 points ago +7 / -0

The “Journalist” finally has the balls to speak out against the ridiculous mandates , but still prefaces his comments with “I took two shots and a booster so I could see loved ones but still think it was necessary .”

DoggyDawg 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ya, the preface is completely unnecessary, but so many people still say it lest they get labeled as anti-vaxers by liberals.

Urallfucked -10 points ago +1 / -11

No explicit evidence other than common sense - this'll help reach the target to reduce risk for vulnerable pops

But no evidence and evidence that it was counter intuitive / actually ineffective are two different things

Bannonmeharder 6 points ago +6 / -0

The dumbest thing we have read all day

Urallfucked -7 points ago +1 / -8

I sincerely doubt it buddy. Im yet to see you reach there syllables. Grade 1 reading and science comprehension all around

Bannonmeharder 4 points ago +4 / -0

Your entire narrative has fallen to ashes
All that is left is for you to continue to get jabs for yourself.
We are winning the information war. The tide has turned. Everyone knows the jabs are a fraud and are harmful.

Everyone knows you are a fraud. Why you continue? Who knows what your actual motives are. It’s not peoples health. That’s clear

CanadianRighty [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Look at this religious zealot twist itself into a pretzel, explaining that direct evidence isn’t necessary.

Why did your god continuously lie and say he based the mandate on science?

I understand you have blind faith in the Liberal church, but the constitution required your god’s illegal edict to be “demonstrably justifiable”.

Now run along to the temple of vaccine and get a few more boosters asap please.