People who do not know what the vaccines are made of are not morally culpable. Those who know and benefit from the crime are guilty of it.
"One fetus in 1966."
Would it be okay if we used the cells of one murdered Jewish child killed in one of Doctor Mengele's medical experiments? Could we say that it was only one murder and it saved so many lives so we can all have a clear conscience? Would that make Mengele a good man for the good he brought the world (in this thought experiement)?
Obviously they were not aborted for the covid vaccine. But they were aborted, and like ghouls we are using their body parts.
Let's see if you are capable of lateral thinking. Let's assume that Mengele's horrific experiments on twins actually, by a fortuitous chance, yielded crucial information that would help develop a covid vaccine. Perhaps one of the samples he collected from the twins he murdered had some useful genetic material, say a genetic trait that made the person immune to covid. If Mengele had not tortured and killed this child and put one of their organs in formaldehyde we would have never had this precious genetic material. Thus - stay with me - the murder (though for a completely different purpose, and frankly plain quackery on the part of Mengele) led to an an unexpected benefit. Do we profit from that crime by using it for the greater good?
This question has actually been considered by medical ethicists. The Nazis used to conduct experiments on hypothermia by killing Jews by freezing them to death. The research data generated is actually useful and could be used to save patients suffering from hypothermia. The ethical consensus is that this data must not be used because it is the product of murder and it does not matter how much good it might produce.
Now as for the greater good that you propose, that is just a bullshit number. Kids are almost completely free of complications and almost none have died, even using the inflated government statistics. There was a moral panic when a 10 year old died in the US conveniently just as the government started to push the vaxx for children, but when you saw his picture he must have weighed 300 pounds. His parents were disgusting people for letting a 10 year old become a whale, but in that state a cold or flu would eventually have killed him. No need to upend society and turn it into a medical apartheid state.
Why do you keep saying "babies"? One fetus in 1966.
You're saying this applies to virtually everyone in the western world? "live a thousand years"?
Folks, I'm thinking this is a shitpost.
Just pointing out that it's not "babies".
And you skipped the answer to the question about your claim about all the vaccinated people in the world living a thousand years.
Curious about that.
There it is folks.
People who do not know what the vaccines are made of are not morally culpable. Those who know and benefit from the crime are guilty of it.
Would it be okay if we used the cells of one murdered Jewish child killed in one of Doctor Mengele's medical experiments? Could we say that it was only one murder and it saved so many lives so we can all have a clear conscience? Would that make Mengele a good man for the good he brought the world (in this thought experiement)?
You seem to think the foetus was aborted specifically for this purpose.
Did you read the earlier comments? About the daily fatality count for children? You're OK with it going back up by a factor of three?
Tell the folks why that would be a good thing.
Obviously they were not aborted for the covid vaccine. But they were aborted, and like ghouls we are using their body parts.
Let's see if you are capable of lateral thinking. Let's assume that Mengele's horrific experiments on twins actually, by a fortuitous chance, yielded crucial information that would help develop a covid vaccine. Perhaps one of the samples he collected from the twins he murdered had some useful genetic material, say a genetic trait that made the person immune to covid. If Mengele had not tortured and killed this child and put one of their organs in formaldehyde we would have never had this precious genetic material. Thus - stay with me - the murder (though for a completely different purpose, and frankly plain quackery on the part of Mengele) led to an an unexpected benefit. Do we profit from that crime by using it for the greater good?
This question has actually been considered by medical ethicists. The Nazis used to conduct experiments on hypothermia by killing Jews by freezing them to death. The research data generated is actually useful and could be used to save patients suffering from hypothermia. The ethical consensus is that this data must not be used because it is the product of murder and it does not matter how much good it might produce.
Now as for the greater good that you propose, that is just a bullshit number. Kids are almost completely free of complications and almost none have died, even using the inflated government statistics. There was a moral panic when a 10 year old died in the US conveniently just as the government started to push the vaxx for children, but when you saw his picture he must have weighed 300 pounds. His parents were disgusting people for letting a 10 year old become a whale, but in that state a cold or flu would eventually have killed him. No need to upend society and turn it into a medical apartheid state.
What would happen to it if we stopped using the vaccines that have been developed since 1966 using MRC-5 and HEK 293 cell cultures?