Pandemics occur now and again, about every hundred years on average: https://www.visualcapitalist.com/history-of-pandemics-deadliest/
In 2005 Bush predicted a pandemic - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=spcj6KUr4aA
In 2014 Obama predicted a pandemic - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pBVAnaHxHbM
2008 - "the likelihood of a flu pandemic in the next 50 years approaches 100%" - a review of 'Global Catastrophes and Trends' - Vaclav Smil https://vaclavsmil.com/wp-content/uploads/docs/smil-bookreview-global-catastrophes20080000-predicting-the-future.pdf
2012 - "David Quammen speculates that there would indeed be a new disease, likely from the coronavirus family, coming out of a bat, and it would likely emerge in or around a wet market in China." - 'Spillover: Animal Infections and the Next Human Pandemic' - https://thebulletin.org/2020/06/how-it-feels-to-predict-a-pandemic-interview-with-david-quammen-author-of-spillover/
2017 - A scenario that encourages public health agencies to prepare. 'SPARS Pandemic Scenario' https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/Center-projects/completed-projects/spars-pandemic-scenario.html
2017 - "a dismal introduction on the threat of epidemics" 'Deadliest Enemy: Our War Against Killer Germs' - Michael T. Osterholm and Mark Olshaker
2019 - "We assess that the United States and the world will remain vulnerable to the next flu pandemic or large-scale outbreak of a contagious disease that could lead to massive rates of death and disability, severely affect the world economy, strain international resources, and increase calls on the United States for support" WORLDWIDE THREAT ASSESSMENT of the US INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY - https://www.odni.gov/files/ODNI/documents/2019-ATA-SFR---SSCI.pdf
The hoax was not that there was and is a Wuhan flu virus circulating. The hoax is three fold: 1) to hide the obvious links to the Wuhan virology lab and the fact that this virus is bioengineered and 2) exaggerating the lethality of the virus and your personal odds of dying from it 3) exaggerating the claims of safety and effectiveness for an unproven mrna modification therapy.
As usual folks these personal opinions are unsupported by any authority.
What links would those be?
Got any facts?
The numbers are easily found: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus, https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/
Those claims are easily supported, and they show that unvaccinated people run the risk of being hit harder when they eventually pick up the virus: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/2796235, https://doh.wa.gov/sites/default/files/2022-02/421-010-CasesInNotFullyVaccinated.pdf, https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#rates-by-vaccine-status, https://www.alberta.ca/stats/covid-19-alberta-statistics.htm#vaccine-effectiveness, https://www.contagionlive.com/view/covid-19-hospitalizations-broken-down-by-vaccination-status, https://covid19-sciencetable.ca/ontario-dashboard/, https://coronavirus.health.ny.gov/covid-19-breakthrough-data
Actually you obstuse fat cell I do.
So regarding the links to Wuhan. The epicenter of the outbreak is within a few hundred meters of a virology lab where, before the Wuhan virus escape, the scientists were publishing papers about the gain of function research they were doing on bat coronoviruses specifically aimed at making them more infectious to humans.
Chinese virology labs are known to have extremely lax safety standards, so much so that State Department officials who had toured that lab during the Obama administration sent an urgent cable home warning of an imminent escape. Indeed Chinese biolabs are known to have leaked and caused localized outbreaks of Sars 1 on three previous occasions.
Furthermore, the virus shows characteristics of bioengineering, including gene sequences from 1) the hiv virus and 2) a gene sequence patented by moderna, years before the Wuhan virus, not found in nature. The odds of these things happening randomly are astronomically improbable. Furthermore the location of the outbreak next to the very lab working on genetically modifying a bat coronavirus to make it more infectious to humans speaks for itself. It would be like finding a pollutant produced by a specific factory downstream of the river where that factory sits and nowhere upstream.
Regarding the odds of dying, the odds are not evenly distributed and affect mostly the aged and the fat like you. For other people the odds of serious issues are much less than 1 percent. They made it sound like it was apocalyptic. Now that the world has moved on, and the media is no longer hyping it, you don't see the apocalyptic claims of the winter of death and other nonsense which in itself tells you that it was mostly hype.
Regarding the MRNA therarpy, it clearly does not prevent transmission. It does not reduce risk and you do not and cannot factor in the consequences of this therapy. There has been a significant rise in excess deaths in all jurisdictions that had mass vaccination campaigns, and the rise in deaths correlates with the mass adoption of the mrna vaccines. Vaccines usually undergo years of testing and most are not approved due to safety concerns. These mrna vaccines did not undergo long term testing. Apart from the obvious evidence of risks associated with them, your basic tuchidiocy is in shifting the burden of proof. It is not for me to prove them unsafe. They have not been proven safe.
See folks? Not a single link.
Just unsupported opinions from someone you don't know.
Don't take medical advice from anonymous people on social media. Get it from known medical experts.
You see, you mentally deficient, you seem to be unaware of the obvious. A pathetic postule feeding on the reddit pablum letting your fat brain get worked on by their echo chamber.
Well here we go: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/04/14/state-department-cables-warned-safety-issues-wuhan-lab-studying-bat-coronaviruses/
https://archive.ph/dvlSg (moderna gene sequence.)
From 2004: "Breaches of safety regulations are probable cause of recent SARS outbreak, WHO says"
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC416634/
And here is an article from 2010 by one of the top virologists at the Wuhan lab talking about the work they were doing on bat coronaviruses at the Wuhan lab. There are dozens others https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00705-010-0729-6
I would provide more links, but why don't you educate yourself instead of being a smug ignoramus.