You assume that because some paid hack says there was no nefarious purpose that there is no nefarious purpose.
These people are far removed from what we once considered reporters. In any event, does negligence and incompetence instead of nefarious purpose make it better.
These inflated numbers were used to justify crazy and oppressive policies. They were used to take away freedoms and force poisons into people, feeding a mass hysteria that has still not completely gone away. You diehard vaxxers are the flotsam left behind by the receding tide of this sad episode in our history. You got duped, but cling to straws rather than admit it. Say it now: it does not matter if these people were nefarious or just completely incompetent.
This is sort of the ourobouros of unsupported opinions. You give unsupported opinions to allege that those of another are unsupported. That's the kind of lazy things one would expect from you.
From the zombie's article folks: "There is no truth to the conspiracy theory that hospitals are trying to exaggerate coronavirus numbers for some nefarious purpose." https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/01/13/covid-pandemic-deaths-hospitalizations-overcounting/
You assume that because some paid hack says there was no nefarious purpose that there is no nefarious purpose.
These people are far removed from what we once considered reporters. In any event, does negligence and incompetence instead of nefarious purpose make it better.
These inflated numbers were used to justify crazy and oppressive policies. They were used to take away freedoms and force poisons into people, feeding a mass hysteria that has still not completely gone away. You diehard vaxxers are the flotsam left behind by the receding tide of this sad episode in our history. You got duped, but cling to straws rather than admit it. Say it now: it does not matter if these people were nefarious or just completely incompetent.
Unsupported opinions folks. Just another anonymous person spouting off on social media.
This is sort of the ourobouros of unsupported opinions. You give unsupported opinions to allege that those of another are unsupported. That's the kind of lazy things one would expect from you.
Folks, here's Kinder12's comment and post history: https://omegacanada.win/u/Kronder12/?type=comment
Here's mine: https://omegacanada.win/u/tuchodi/?type=comment
I invite you to compare them for links / unsupported opinions.