No peer review by any kind of covid expert, or anyone else with an even remotely relevant background.
They have their own way of calculating excess deaths so they have - in effect - invented their own language. They're going to have to teach that language to other experts in the field before anyone knows whether their method stands the test of time.
No doubt there's more, but I think the prudent thing to do would be to see if they can convince anyone with a relevant medical background.
This would be the equivalent of a pre-print, except that it isn't even in a medical journal. Still it's a cut above BSYH's usual offerings by anonymous tabloid journalists and worse.
I'm content to wait to see if anything comes of it.
A paper by a Wall Street carreerist, a physicist, and a physics & finance guy. https://www.phinancetechnologies.com/HumanityProjects/Humanity%20About.asp
No peer review by any kind of covid expert, or anyone else with an even remotely relevant background.
They have their own way of calculating excess deaths so they have - in effect - invented their own language. They're going to have to teach that language to other experts in the field before anyone knows whether their method stands the test of time.
No doubt there's more, but I think the prudent thing to do would be to see if they can convince anyone with a relevant medical background.
This would be the equivalent of a pre-print, except that it isn't even in a medical journal. Still it's a cut above BSYH's usual offerings by anonymous tabloid journalists and worse.
I'm content to wait to see if anything comes of it.