TLDR;
The spike protein suppressed the "DNA damage response" in the tested cancer cell lines (tumors that continue replicating long after the patient from who they were harvested died).
Without the "DNA damage response" an immune system cannot see the damaged cells.
Part of the "DNA damage response" being undermined in the way the study says it's being undermined is that the signal to slow down cell growth and replication does not occur. When this exact factor is missing, it confers chemotherapy resistance and is a driver of cancer formation.
Disclaimer;
When cells fuse instead of bursting, as is the case with SARS-CoV-2, that "DNA damage response" can go off in the fused cells because they are not supposed to be fused. So this does not necessarily represent a live model. But, they should probably follow this up with a statistical study of which types of cancers are becoming "turbo". We'd expect to see it everywhere but the kidneys and testis. Modified for the tissue specificity of the vax (eyes, ovaries, adrenal glands, spleen).
Hope this helps. It's crazy that the same person is here chasing cars and seems to have learned little doing it.
From the study:
In summary, we identified the SARS-CoV-2 spike S2 subunit as a COVID-19 virus factor that interrupts p53 binding to MDM2 in cancer cells and demonstrated the suppressive effect of SARSCoV-2 spike S2 on p53 signaling in cancer cells. Correlated to the inhibition of p53 signaling, the short-term expression of spike S2 caused an altered DNA damage response through altered levels of g-H2AX after DNA damage in cells, altered sensing in the damage response to cisplatin Importantly, the p53-dependent DNA damage induction of growth arrest and apoptotic targets p21(WAF1) and TRAIL Death Receptor DR5 was significantly attenuated under different experimental conditions with spike S2 and this was associated with greater cell viability in the presence of spike S2 and chemotherapy treatment. As loss of p53 function is a known driver of cancer development and confers chemo-resistance, our study provides insight into cellular mechanisms by which SARS-CoV-2 spike S2 may be involved in reducing barriers to tumorigenesis during and post SARS-CoV-2 infections
There is an "I'm not transcribing my DNA correctly" molecule in cells. A fidelity checker. This gets turned off by the spike protein. Normally the cell will slow itself down and call for the immune system to kill it before it divides too many times.
The spike protein keeps it going fast and wrong and undetected. So the cancer is "turbo" now and going hard enough that it will be chemotherapy resistant because the amount required will harm the patient too much.
We should be seeing this in the areas the vaccine likes to settle and where there are the right receptors for this to happen.
Why don't you celebrate after it gets past the pre print stage? Y'all always parade shady studies littered with authors who get speaking fees (corruption money basically) and never make it past peer review. In other words; scientific swill.
Here's the preprint you didn't bother looking up. It wasn't proven to happen in actual cells, and they clarify that it has implications for primary covid infection and also mRNA shots -
so you can go and roleplay being right all you want but it's equally as applicable to idiots who got infected without being protected, if at all.
I haven't "shilled" any specific thing, I've just proven again and again that yall are full of shit constantly. If you want an example of shilling let me direct you to when y'all sold eachother horse paste and told pregnant woman they had nothing to worry about.
TLDR; The spike protein suppressed the "DNA damage response" in the tested cancer cell lines (tumors that continue replicating long after the patient from who they were harvested died).
Without the "DNA damage response" an immune system cannot see the damaged cells.
Part of the "DNA damage response" being undermined in the way the study says it's being undermined is that the signal to slow down cell growth and replication does not occur. When this exact factor is missing, it confers chemotherapy resistance and is a driver of cancer formation.
Disclaimer; When cells fuse instead of bursting, as is the case with SARS-CoV-2, that "DNA damage response" can go off in the fused cells because they are not supposed to be fused. So this does not necessarily represent a live model. But, they should probably follow this up with a statistical study of which types of cancers are becoming "turbo". We'd expect to see it everywhere but the kidneys and testis. Modified for the tissue specificity of the vax (eyes, ovaries, adrenal glands, spleen).
Hope this helps. It's crazy that the same person is here chasing cars and seems to have learned little doing it.
From the study:
There is an "I'm not transcribing my DNA correctly" molecule in cells. A fidelity checker. This gets turned off by the spike protein. Normally the cell will slow itself down and call for the immune system to kill it before it divides too many times.
The spike protein keeps it going fast and wrong and undetected. So the cancer is "turbo" now and going hard enough that it will be chemotherapy resistant because the amount required will harm the patient too much.
We should be seeing this in the areas the vaccine likes to settle and where there are the right receptors for this to happen.
Why don't you celebrate after it gets past the pre print stage? Y'all always parade shady studies littered with authors who get speaking fees (corruption money basically) and never make it past peer review. In other words; scientific swill.
You would know a thing or two about con men, wouldn't you?
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.04.12.589252.full.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjGv_jo1uCFAxXMLFkFHX4yCkcQFnoECA0QAQ&usg=AOvVaw3D5sELPBRMW4mrUMjn3gJH
Here's the preprint you didn't bother looking up. It wasn't proven to happen in actual cells, and they clarify that it has implications for primary covid infection and also mRNA shots -
so you can go and roleplay being right all you want but it's equally as applicable to idiots who got infected without being protected, if at all.
Projection: someone takes the shame guilt fear they fear in their own hearts and apply it to anyone else in an accusatory way.
Nobody projects better than you do.
I haven't "shilled" any specific thing, I've just proven again and again that yall are full of shit constantly. If you want an example of shilling let me direct you to when y'all sold eachother horse paste and told pregnant woman they had nothing to worry about.