you don't want to debate about abortion because you know you're in the wrong about everything.
Presumptuous. Outstanding of you to not only believe I'm "in the wrong about everything", but actually think I share your belief.... Which I suppose I'd be wrong about too?
“There’s only one explanation for this staggering difference in maternal mortality,” said Nancy L. Cohen
Shallow and arrogant take.
From 2019 to 2022, the rate of maternal mortality cases in Texas rose by 56%, compared with just 11% nationwide during the same time period
2019 to 2022 you say? Yeah, there couldn't possibly be other confounding variables in there, like, say, malicious agenda-driven medical malpractice that deprived unvaccinated from health care to help sell the lie. Actually I don't know if they did that in Texas but it sure was how things went down in my home province of BC.
But anyhow, it's not material to my argument, since it ignores the fact that even if it's true that the percentage of maternal deaths increase (which is truly a sad thing and I don't want this to be misinterpreted as lacking in compassion for these women), for every woman saved from an untimely death by your method (mass acceptance, enablement, and dare I say celebration of abortion) there must be untold numbers of unborn babies murdered in the womb. Have you considered the possibility that these discrepancies in healthcare outcomes could be addressed in ways other than the mass slaughter of the unborn? Or that health outcomes are improved for those who didn't get an abortion but would have were a ban not in effect? Or that in the long term, with such a ban in effect, people will adapt and change their behaviour, and that many people see these changes as changes for the better?
Our study provides evidence that decreasing the number of abortion restrictions across the states may [emphasis mine] reduce incidence of death during pregnancy and postpartum among all women in the US
Well you know what? It may not. That's an awfully tepid argument considering the abomination against life that you're trying to implement. I wonder how many lives the ban saved.
Presumptuous. Outstanding of you to not only believe I'm "in the wrong about everything", but actually think I share your belief.... Which I suppose I'd be wrong about too?
Shallow and arrogant take.
2019 to 2022 you say? Yeah, there couldn't possibly be other confounding variables in there, like, say, malicious agenda-driven medical malpractice that deprived unvaccinated from health care to help sell the lie. Actually I don't know if they did that in Texas but it sure was how things went down in my home province of BC.
But anyhow, it's not material to my argument, since it ignores the fact that even if it's true that the percentage of maternal deaths increase (which is truly a sad thing and I don't want this to be misinterpreted as lacking in compassion for these women), for every woman saved from an untimely death by your method (mass acceptance, enablement, and dare I say celebration of abortion) there must be untold numbers of unborn babies murdered in the womb. Have you considered the possibility that these discrepancies in healthcare outcomes could be addressed in ways other than the mass slaughter of the unborn? Or that health outcomes are improved for those who didn't get an abortion but would have were a ban not in effect? Or that in the long term, with such a ban in effect, people will adapt and change their behaviour, and that many people see these changes as changes for the better?
Well you know what? It may not. That's an awfully tepid argument considering the abomination against life that you're trying to implement. I wonder how many lives the ban saved.