She's calling it infections in the article when it is "cases" - ie not even confirmed or guaranteed in any way. They have 658 cases out of 40,900 tests. Not deaths. Not hospitalizaitons. Not in ICU. Not bedridden or showing symptoms or dying or on ventilators or remotely sick. Just potential positive antibodies found in fucked up testing system where the number of cycles dictate how many false positives you get. Even 5 less cycles from 40 to 35 results in 90% reduction in "cases". 10 less is over 97% less "cases". These people are insane. They all should hang on parliment hill for their traitorous and evil ways.
Yes, you are correct, but they still have to cycle it and the number of cycles determines the sensitivity of the test. The problem like he said above is that if you change the cycles it has a massive effect on what comes back positive or negative. This means people who have so little of the genetic material the test looks still comes back positive if the cycle count is too high, meaning that they are both asymptomatic and non infectious and thus not real cases. Never mind the creator of the PCR test has publicly stated it was not designed for this kind of purpose nor is it appropriate. Never mind that prior to covid a case of any disease was only a person who was showing symptoms or was infectious, now suddenly a positive result on a test ,that in the USA atleast has been proven to have a rate of 90% false positives, is now counted as an infection/case. It’s designed so everyone is guilty until proven otherwise and they have the means to make you guilty with a fake test.
The test doesn't look for a meaning. It only tells you if you have the virus or not. It doesn't say anything about the person being infectious or symptomatic.
Never mind the creator of the PCR test has publicly stated it was not designed for this kind of purpose nor is it appropriate
This is not true. The inventor of the test said that it wasn't suited to identifying a virus, because the test doesn't look for the virus. But the inventor said that the test is suited for looking for of gene sequences of a virus. And this is what the test does. It looks for two specific gene sequences of the Coronavirus and you need to have both in you swab to get tested positive.
USA atleast has been proven to have a rate of 90% false positives
Sounds like a Facebook meme. Would like to have more infos about that.
Detection of anti-bodies doesn't mean that it's over for you and the passed your Covid infection. You could still be in the battling phase and fighting actively the virus.
She's calling it infections in the article when it is "cases" - ie not even confirmed or guaranteed in any way. They have 658 cases out of 40,900 tests. Not deaths. Not hospitalizaitons. Not in ICU. Not bedridden or showing symptoms or dying or on ventilators or remotely sick. Just potential positive antibodies found in fucked up testing system where the number of cycles dictate how many false positives you get. Even 5 less cycles from 40 to 35 results in 90% reduction in "cases". 10 less is over 97% less "cases". These people are insane. They all should hang on parliment hill for their traitorous and evil ways.
As far as I know Ontario uses PCR tests and these don't look for antibodies. PCR tests look for genetic sequences of the China flu in your swab.
Yes, you are correct, but they still have to cycle it and the number of cycles determines the sensitivity of the test. The problem like he said above is that if you change the cycles it has a massive effect on what comes back positive or negative. This means people who have so little of the genetic material the test looks still comes back positive if the cycle count is too high, meaning that they are both asymptomatic and non infectious and thus not real cases. Never mind the creator of the PCR test has publicly stated it was not designed for this kind of purpose nor is it appropriate. Never mind that prior to covid a case of any disease was only a person who was showing symptoms or was infectious, now suddenly a positive result on a test ,that in the USA atleast has been proven to have a rate of 90% false positives, is now counted as an infection/case. It’s designed so everyone is guilty until proven otherwise and they have the means to make you guilty with a fake test.
The test doesn't look for a meaning. It only tells you if you have the virus or not. It doesn't say anything about the person being infectious or symptomatic.
This is not true. The inventor of the test said that it wasn't suited to identifying a virus, because the test doesn't look for the virus. But the inventor said that the test is suited for looking for of gene sequences of a virus. And this is what the test does. It looks for two specific gene sequences of the Coronavirus and you need to have both in you swab to get tested positive.
Sounds like a Facebook meme. Would like to have more infos about that.
Ahh thanks for pointing out the typo/ edit failure there lol. I retyped that bit hopefully it makes a bit more sense.
Fair enough, my point being is that the cycle count is what skews the results. There are sources that agree with this https://bpa-pathology.com/covid19-pcr-tests-are-scientifically-meaningless/
And yeah I know it sounds like a meme but it’s right here https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testing.html
“up to 90 percent of people testing positive carried barely any virus, a review by The Times found.”
New definition of cases in Ontario. The cases spike as soon as they changed the definition. They are running the biggest scam in history and laughing at you.
Detection of anti-bodies doesn't mean that it's over for you and the passed your Covid infection. You could still be in the battling phase and fighting actively the virus.