Your own link references a science study that says vaccination is recommended, because "Seropositivity for anti-N antibodies should not be interpreted as protection from future infection." - meaning just surviving covid is not enough - and goes on to recommend getting vaccinated.

Why is that not good enough for you? It's not the opinion of some individual article writer. It's the result of the analysis of 5 recent months of data from 50 US states plus some territories, involving many tens of thousands of individual cases, by a team of trained scientists.

Why isn't natural immunity or negative tests good enough for travel here

Is that not science enough for you?

Your own link references a science study that says vaccination is recommended, because "Seropositivity for anti-N antibodies should not be interpreted as protection from future infection." - meaning just surviving covid is not enough - and goes on to recommend getting vaccinated.

Why is that not good enough for you? It's not the opinion of some individual article writer. It's the result of the analysis of 5 recent months of data from 50 US states plus some territories, involving many tens of thousands of individual cases, by a team of trained scientists:

Is that not science enough for you?

Your own link references a science study that says vaccination is recommended, because __ "Seropositivity for anti-N antibodies should not be interpreted as protection from future infection."__ - meaning just surviving covid is not enough - and goes on to recommend getting vaccinated.

Why is that not good enough for you? It's not the opinion of some individual article writer. It's the result of the analysis of 5 recent months of data from 50 US states plus some territories, involving many tens of thousands of individual cases, by a team of trained scientists:

Is that not science enough for you?