Yes, you are correct, but they still have to cycle it and the number of cycles determines the sensitivity of the test. The problem like he said above is that if you change the cycles it has a massive effect on what comes back positive or negative. This means people who have so little of the genetic material the test looks still comes back positive if the cycle count is too high, meaning that they are both asymptomatic and non infectious and thus not real cases. Never mind the creator of the PCR test has publicly stated it was not designed for this kind of purpose nor is it appropriate. Never mind that prior to covid a case of any disease was only a person who was showing symptoms or was infectious, now suddenly a positive result on a test ,that in the USA atleast has been proven to have a rate of 90% false positives, is now counted as an infection/case. It’s designed so everyone is guilty until proven otherwise and they have the means to make you guilty with a fake test.

Yes, you are correct, but they still have to cycle it and the number of cycles determines the sensitivity of the test. The problem like he said above is that if you change the cycles it has a massive effect on what comes back positive or negative. This means people who have so little of the genetic material the test looks for meaning that they are both asymptomatic and non infectious, still comes back positive depending on how they calibrate the test. Never mind the creator of the PCR test has publicly stated it was not designed for this kind of purpose nor is it appropriate. Never mind that prior to covid a case of any disease was only a person who was showing symptoms or was infectious, now suddenly a positive result on a test ,that in the USA atleast has been proven to have a rate of 90% false positives, is now counted as an infection/case. It’s designed so everyone is guilty until proven otherwise and they have the means to make you guilty with a fake test.