In her video she says she would do get the vaccine again because it is what you need to do in order to do people. The deluded ignoramus still thinks that the vaxx prevents infection and transmission. She has a Tuchodi level of delusion. Nothing will save her. She will keep boosting and recharging her immune system with quarterly jabs until there will be nothing left of her.
There is more to it, though. This is a bio engineered weapon. It is known that the Chinese are harvesting data from dna testing services to try to build a weapon to target specific ethnic groups, particularly Caucasians. It does seem that this virus does not affect Africans as much. Africans have no neanderthal dna whereas Europeans and those of European descent have about 3 percent neanderthal dna. They may have made it to attack mainly Whites. I realize there may be other reasons why Africa has a much lower death toll such as the widespread use of hydrocholoquoxine and ivermectin to treat local malaria and worm infestations. Yum! Ring worms. But at least they don't get covid.
That's too bad. That's one of the reasons I wanted to read the decision and see if the hype was warranted.
They do say that the probation condition that forced the pastor to speak a disclaimer discrediting himself every time he spoke publicly was unconstitutional, but the government conceded this point so this is probably not a very useful precedent.
I wonder if blocking them at that stage also reduces them to permanent infantilism. Puberty is not just about sexual development. There are massive changes in the brain as you move towards through puberty towards adulthood. I am betting that if you block that development you permanently prevent them from reaching adulthood. There will be a whole generation of sexually mutilated adults with the emotional and mental development of children
You are wrong about that. Astrazeneca and JJ both modify mrna and just through a different vector. JJ even modifies dna. Astrazeneca perhaps hasnt done as good pr as pfizer but in many countries it has been withdrawn for causing more deaths and complications than it prevents. This is after people were told it was safe and pressured to take it with vaccine mandates. You can't undo that oops.
https://time.com/5947134/astrazeneca-covid-vaccine-stopped/
Astrazeneca is an object less of what I am saying. It was approved. It was deemed effective and that the risks outweighed the benefit. People took it in good faith on the advice of the establishment and subject to coercion by mandates only to find out later that it was not safe and was withdrawn. What makes y ou think that the same will or should not happen to the other vaccines in time. The problem is that those who have taken it cannot undo their choice. Many have died. And this is only because the correlation between the effects and astra were to obvious to ignore. The other vaccines will have their turn. We are already starting to see the warning signs like a canary in the coal mine.
The Canadian made vaccine based on tobacco plants looks interesting but it too lacks rigorous long term statement. We have no idea what injecting plant based analogues of the spike protein actually does long term. If you go to their website you will see that they only tracked adverse effects for a few weeks of administration. So there is no way of knowing what it does long term.
You probably wouldnt eat a food product with some sort of untested novel additive, maybe made from genetically modified tobacco, yet you think it is okay to inject people and coerce them to do so.
You seem to think that rushing a vaxx to market in a few weeks is justified because of the deaths that could have happened in five years, being the usual term of testing. Then you should apply that logic to every disease. If a vaccine is being developed it is most likely for something that can kill you. But you need long term studies to determine if the cost benefit risk of the vaccine is justified. In most cases, despite being tested for the prevention of various deadly diseases such as small pox, for example, the vaccine candidate fails the testing process. It sucks but the alternative is to just kill people with vaccines. All of these safeguards were ignored in a mad rush to develop vaccines for a low mortality disease. Further review of the raw data from pfizer raises questions about the validity of even their initial claims of effectiveness and safety.
Apart from everything else, the onus of proving the vaccines is safe is on the companies and the authorities trying to make everyone take them. It is not up to me to prove that they are unsafe.
The fact that they were unleashed on the public after 9 weeks of study, when normal vaccines usually undergo 5 years of rigorous double blind studies, should in and of itself be reason to not take them. There is no way they know what the long term effects are, especially since mrna vaccines have never been used before.
But we are seeing clear indications that they cause health problems, and this is to be anticipated and on top of issues with what mrna modification does to your body, the fact is that these vaccines cannot control for dosage.
In normal vaccines, one of the key steps in determining safety is determining what is a safe dose. In normal vaccines the manufacturer can control for how many deactivated or weakened viral particles you get in the injection because you only get what is in the syringe
With these mrna vaccines they can control how much they put into the syringe but they cannot control how many spike proteins your body produces once the vaxx hijacks your dna. Results will vary. This is probably why some experience myocarditis. However these early effects are nothing compared to the long term damage.
I can predict the future because I am aware of sufficient facts and variables. Remember this discussion when you are in your doctor's office and they give you the news.
You keep saying delusional things however. I did not give you one link but many, and if you were not closed minded you could find more on your own.
Tuchodi wrote on Omega, that he rolled the dice and got vaxed after watching CBC TV experts, and pharma CEO’s, tell him it was safe. So he submitted to experimental shot without even knowing any of the short term or long term side effects.
This is the extent of most people's "trust the science" strategy. Considering that big pharma brought us Thalidomide, the Opioid epidemic, and so much more, it is amazing anyone would be stupid enough to trust them.
I am not saying that vaccines are prescription drugs are inherently bad, but for God's sake even a car mechanic should have enough common sense to be a little skeptical.
I see now it's come out that the vaxx companies' assurances that the vaxx is safe for pregnant women was based on a study involving 44 rats. If I had a pet rat I am she would be reassured but women should be running away from this untested shit as fast as they can.
I have supported them and you could verify what I said with a little bit of research. Going back to your original post, I explained why the conclusions you draw from the chart are meaningless due to to how the data is shaped. It is you who have an opinion, which led you to plant the hungry little alien inside you. Sorry but it won't end well for you. You just don't know where your mistake has led you yet.
You are back! It is a witch hunt. They silence anyone who speaks out against the narrative and this makes the ones who are cowards go along. What independent research have the doctors who claim it is safe and effective done, except to parrot the party line and keep their heads down so they don't get fired or have their license stripped from them.
There was an emergency room doctor in NYC during the early days of the pandemic who posted a video stating that it was reckless to intubate patients routinely, that it was actually causing needless deaths. They immediately fired and suspended his license. Turns out he was right; they were intubation happy at the beginning and this is why less people are dying now. But I guess his career is ruined for speaking the truth,
The fact that they would suspend her license for having a differing medical opinion is astounding and telling. The fact that "truth" has to be forced on people displays the fragility of the official dogma. Kind of like the Inquisition, no?
Besides if you had read the article I linked to you would have seen that it quotes directly from the Pfizer disclosure warnings.
And by the way if you thing that Dr. Sarbjit at the local Walgreens is going to heroically save your life if you go into anaphalctic shock you are mistaken. But people focus too much on death within 15 minutes of getting the shot. Just like the vaccine trials only lasted 9 weeks. By those standards inhaling asbestos or smoking 10 packs a day is perfectly safe. Neither of those things is likely to kill you in a few months. Just wait. There is a kraken inside of you now.
If I got paid to save the vaxxers from themselves, this would be a very worthwhile endeavor. Unfortunately you dismiss the mass of evidence including detailed analysis of the pfizer raw data which shows it never justified the claims they made.
https://merylnass.substack.com/p/official-documents-reveal-enormous?s=r
Or you can ignore the fact that the deaths among the vaccinated actually are over represented considering their percentage of the population.
But as someone once said in another context, you may not believe in the devil but the devil believes in you. And so you may not believe that the vaxx is poison, but it doesnt matter what you believe.
It has already planted its seed inside you and one day when you least expect it it will blossom forth as cancer, neurological disease or heart disease. You will lie to yourself and say that there is no connection between the choice you made, and that your misfortune is a matter of genetics or some totally unrelated thing. Perhaps you will live long enough to see friends and relatives also succumb to sudden disease, the unexpected crumbling of their health.
It's sad that you are unaware of what I am talking about. Remember that the mainstream media is censored. Social media shuts down all dissenting voices even when they are right. This is the very reason that this site and all other .win sites exist. The fact that they marginalize information and label it "misinformation" doesnt mean it isnt true. As Galileo is reputed to have said when he was forced to recant that the earth revolved around the sun, he said "And yet it moves."
They were not reporting what the trials showed. None of the trials actually confirmed 94 percent prevention of infection. In fact more people died in the group that got the vaccine than the unvaxxed group. Moreover they discounted symptoms of covid in the vaxxed group by labeling it a cold or flu without doing testing, how convenient. If you don't believe me look up the battle between Pfizer and various groups to block the raw data of their studies for over 90 years. That in itself should worry you. What they have been forced to disclose is even more worrisome and there are many who have analyzed it. You will not find it in the MSM because most news outlets are bought and paid for. They get advertising dollars from the drug companies and in Canada the legacy media has gotten huge subsidies from the Trudeau government. They know which side their bread is buttered.
If you don't believe me that deaths within 6 months of covid are classified as covid deaths, feel free to look it up. They freely admit it.
And as for you anecdote, okay he was an idiot. But so what. There are lots of idiots on the other side of the argument. I have seen parents with their kid in ICU or dead and buried due to covid complications still shilling for the vaccine saying that their tragedy should not deter you from getting the safe and effective jab.
And also don't fall for the propaganda campaign. Look at it critically. For a while, until they moved on the Ukraine war, the propagandists were churning out "repentance videos" where supposedly dying covid patients repented of not getting the vaxx and urged everyone not to repeat their mistake. Yet they were strangely well groomed and able to speak quite clearly despite supposedly drowning in their own phlegm. I have been in hospital and trust me my first thought is not to go on facebook. Nor would a cameraman be allowed into a covid ward to film this shit. It's mostly bullshit.
If you ever get a chance read a book called Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds. It's available for free on Gutenberg.org. It's an old book, written in the 1800s, but it documents all of the mass psychoses that have afflicted society from religious manias, medical manias and superstitions to financial bubbles like the tulip craze. It's old but when you see the pattern you cannot mistake what happened to us as a society. Because as someone once said, history does not repeat but it rhymes.
Exactly, but you are drawing the wrong conclusions.
-
The fact that there are more undiagnosed cases of covid means that the lethality is actually lower. Dead people tend to be autopsied and their cause of death determined. The ones who beat it on their own are not counted. As I stated, I am one of the uncounted because I developed symptoms and diagnosed with a rapid antigen home test. There was no requirement to report. Millions of others did the same especially after omicron came and it overwhelmed government centers. If you included those numbers in the total, the percentage of death from covid is even less than 1.1 percent.
-
Even if 6 million died of covid you are in fact confusing high infection rate with high lethality. In fact it has a very low fatality rate. The only reason there are so many dead is because so many got infected at the same time. In most cases the disease simply accelerated death from preexisting conditions. It is sad to lose some life expectancy, but it is not a reason to force the healthy and relatively young to play guinea pigs with a vaccine or lose their livelihoods and freedom. In Canada there were editorials and opinion polls advocating for the imprisonment of the unvaxxed until the freedom convoy knocked some sense into politicians. The reality is that even the common cold kills people. If you infect enough people with a relatively benign virus like chicken pox or the cold you will still have mass casualties. People have freaked out over covid because the risk has been hyped and they also confuse vaccination with prevention of disease and transmission, which these vaccines do not accomplish (though they initially lied and said they were 94 percent effective at preventing infection).
-
You are yourself relying on anecdotes. I know nothing about the man your sister told you about and what preexisting conditions he had. I know that if health care professionals were not so obsessed about vaccines and instead recommended weight reduction, benign and proven immune boosting supplements like vitamin d,c,zinc the death toll would be much lower. The health profession is guilty of many unnecessary deaths by failing to give common sense advice and focusing on the vaccines. I won't even go into the unfair libeling of ivermectin which many studies have found to be effective and remains a recommended drug by the World Health Organization for the treatment of the closely related form of Sars-1.
-
You are pointing to the fact that their review turned up some wrongly classified deaths and I assume you mean that the number is trivial. It is hard to say. That is only one probe. There is an ocean of statistics and cases to sift through and no one ever will.
I do have a problem with a system that classified anyone who dies within 6 months of covid as a covid death. This has been a universal standard in the UK and in Canada. It's curious - and telling - that no such statistical approach is used to gauge the mortality and side effects of the vaccine. We have seen, for example, dramatic drops in birthrates throughout the western world following the rollout of vaccines, yet no association is made. We have also seen an increase in SADS and yet explanations like climate change, marijuana, etc are rolled out - all except the elephant in the room.
No one is stopping anyone from taking the vaccine but it is criminally negligent and barbaric to strip people of everything they have worked for, their careers, their freedom to travel, their freedom to associate with others, their freedom to enjoy life, just because they choose to take the small risk that this disease actually entails. I could see the argument if failing to vaccinate put others at risk, but it does not. And don't even use the you are overloading the health system argument. Because if you go there then they should be barring lifestyle diabetics,fatties, druggies and others from the health system but in fact they take up a disproportionate percentage of all health care resources. The city where I live is out millions of dollars in ambulance fees just from collecting junkies and drunks and bringing them to the emergency room which is overloaded with them. Yet you never see editorials suggesting we ban these self inflicted patients from the health care system. I on the other hand had to read editorials in the National Post and others recommending I lose the right to medicare, which I would still have to pay for, or have to pay a special tax to access health care.
Others called for my imprisonment and complete banishment from society.
If you have ever wondered how the Holocaust happened, you saw the beginnings of it here - how a government run propaganda effort managed to brand a significant segment of law abiding citizens as filthy maggots worthy of death.
I am sorry you have bought into the lies they have fed you. I encourage you to do more research and I think you will see I am not wrong. Although it won't save you from whatever damage the vaxxines have already caused you, it might save you from further damage as they start pushing more and more booster shots - since, by the way, no one has studied the cumulative effect of these things beyond two doses. But if the experience in highly vaxxed Israel is any indication it is not good - the vaccines seem to lower natural immunity leading to an ever increasing dependence on more shots to keep the covid at bay.
What percentage of people who get covid do you think actually die from it?
You do realize that the risk of death for someone who does not have a preexisting chronic condition is almost zero, right?
The total case fatality rate is: 1.1 percent (taking into account even the high death toll at the beginning of the disease). This percentage is the average total risk of death for all age groups. But obviously the risk will be higher for the old and the sick with preexisting chronic conditions and lower for the young. So 1,1 percent is a bit scare-mongerish. https://ourworldindata.org/mortality-risk-covid
But as the website points out, the actual risk of death if you are infected is much lower because many cases of covid are not counted and some cases that are counted as death should not be. In other words, the case fatality rate is the percentage of people known to have been infected to are considered to have died with covid. But in many cases, people who get covid were not included in the total so their survival was not recorded, leading to a higher case fatality rate. For example, as in my case, people who were diagnosed at home with a rapid antigen test are not included in that statistic. Plus the death toll at the beginning of the pandemic was much higher. 20 percent of people infected were dying in Wuhan in early 2020. But as treatment improved (and I am not talking about vaccines, but rather the fact that doctors realized that intubation was not a good treatment option, for example) the death rate plummetted. Even if you look at the period prior to the vaccines, the death rate was already below 1 percent.
In addition, some deaths should not be included at all but since they are they tend to increase the case fatality rate. If they were properly excluded the death rate would be lower than 1,1 percent. For example, In the UK, they listed anyone who died within 6 months of having had covid as a covid death. This meant that if you literally got hit by a bus months after recovering, you were counted as a covid death. And by the way, why is the same methodology not applied to the vaxxes. Isnt it convenient that they do not count anyone who died within 6 months of getting the vaxx as a vaxx death. Not that I think they should, but you can see the unequal treatment of the two questions.
As sauce for what I am saying: https://denvergazette.com/news/new-zealand-man-who-died-of-gunshot-wound-to-be-recorded-as-covid-19-death/article_f33fe779-8294-5e91-96c6-a5cb00923a5e.html
https://cbs12.com/news/local/i-team-deaths-incorrectly-attributed-to-covid-19-in-palm-beach-county: examples, 90 year old with parkinsons, a man infected with covid who died in a motorcycle accident.
In contrast to the risk of dying from covid - even using the official but skewed statistics, the risk of dying from tetanus is about 6 percent. The risk of dying from Seasonal flu (US) is 0.1 to 0.2% for the entire population, but of course both covid and flu affect the elderly and the sick much more so individual risk may be higher or lower.
For healthy people both covid and the flu pose a negligible risk. There is no reason to force mass vaccination or impose segregation against the unvaxxed since the covid vaccine does not prevent infection or transmission of covid. Even if we accepted your belief that the vaxx reduces the risk of mortality from covid without increasing the risk of death from other vaxx induced diseases, there is no need because you would be reducing an almost imperceptible risk. If the overall risk of death for the entire population is 1.1 percent, this is not distributed equally among all age groups or other factors. The elderly and people with diabetes may have a risk higher than 1.1 percent but the risk for a healthy 30 year old is almost zero.
There might be a case to be made for vaccinating 90 year olds in care homes because their risk of dying from covid is much higher than the average person and because their remaining life expectancy is so low that any problems from these untested mrna modifications may not even manifest themselves in the remaining time.
Leftists are the new fascists: Bigoted, smug antiscience racists masquerading behind a cloak of wokeness and self righteous feelings of being somehow superior despite failing on every objective scale.