1
Pappy_Gunn 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh well just cashing in on her 10-15 years of good looks. Then she can find some sugar daddy and suck some wrinkled dicks for living.

1
Pappy_Gunn 1 point ago +1 / -0

You mean like a government that would shove a carbon tax down your throat (twice) during a pandemic and use the opportunity to confiscate your guns?

by c2sky
1
Pappy_Gunn 1 point ago +1 / -0

We didn't really like learning English either, but it's easier. Also Sesame Street and the Loony Tunes cartoons helped a lot.

by c2sky
1
Pappy_Gunn 1 point ago +1 / -0

glaring loophole of being creatively interpreted by activist judges and activist lawyers.

Yup. "subject to reasonable limits". Like confiscating leagally-owned private property -guns- from law-abiding citizens.

by c2sky
3
Pappy_Gunn 3 points ago +3 / -0

More like "forefathers" than ancestors, but good translation. I never paid attention, but you're right, the French version has a little more bite to it.

5
Pappy_Gunn 5 points ago +5 / -0

Well if it does, it will be on the cheap with guns taht don't work, so don't worry about it. There is already a propganda and brainwashing unit working for the Liberals: It's called the CBC.

5
Pappy_Gunn 5 points ago +5 / -0

...and by the way, it's "candidate Biden", not "President-elect" Biden.

5
Pappy_Gunn 5 points ago +5 / -0

If I was the judge reviewing the case, I would say that while the man must pay spousal support, the woman has to give him a blowjob 50 times a month, of no payola.

2
Pappy_Gunn 2 points ago +2 / -0

Naw they didn't like her because she was an entitled bitch. They got rid of her and guess what? She is still an entitled bitch.

3
Pappy_Gunn 3 points ago +3 / -0

Well, before Trump came in, it was a one-party system in practice. If they get rid of him, it will be again. In this case, maybe Trump will pull an Obama: buy a house in Washington to run a shadow government operation against the sitting President. It would be fun to see how much shit disturbing Trump can manage. Maybe continue the Trump rallies.

2
Pappy_Gunn 2 points ago +2 / -0

SUPERSPREADER REEEE!

1
Pappy_Gunn 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not easy to narrow it down....

1
Pappy_Gunn 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm pretty sure it had something to do with ze Germans invading France and Belgium.

2
Pappy_Gunn 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, cough cough EXCLUSIVELY cough cough with foreign threats. Say there old chap from 5 eyes, would you mind digging a bit of dirt on that Trump fellow for us?

5
Pappy_Gunn 5 points ago +5 / -0

Global? Why not ask the town drunk instead? He's liable to get it right.

1
Pappy_Gunn 1 point ago +1 / -0

Men should also sit out all coming wars for 130 years, or until all the military cimetaries- including those of Europe - are filled with the equivalent quantity of non-males, whichever comes last. We can draft al the non-males to do their patriotic duty.

9
Pappy_Gunn 9 points ago +9 / -0

Well, it's simply that their mandatory ethics training was out of date. They will re-take the training and all will be well.

1
Pappy_Gunn 1 point ago +1 / -0

Must be those white supremacists again.

3
Pappy_Gunn 3 points ago +3 / -0

and they happen to only go one way too.

5
Pappy_Gunn 5 points ago +5 / -0

It was completely irresponsible for the media to declare Joe the winner. This will end in civil war whomever the winner is. The CBC is even repeating the story.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›