1
canusa65 1 point ago +2 / -1

Six million Canadians still haven't been coerced into getting jabbed. Oddly that number rings familiar.

I wonder if our leaders have the will to be remembered for genocide or not?

1
canusa65 1 point ago +1 / -0

Never back down on what you believe. The terminology they use to coerce is planned by thousands and focus group tested to break down the will of the average person. I recall a site at one University where they were capturing every issue in the market for Catholics, Christian and others to gamify the answers and create a truly labyrinthine answer matrix that HR teams could use to deny exemption. Not sure if many millions are being spent by pharma to break everyone psychologically but there is a concerted effort to do it.

So thank you for your answer but let me say that you don't have to accept their assessment of your belief. It's yours and they would have to be very evil to say you don't believe what you do.

I generally go with the simplest multipronged approach.:

Vaccine mandates that are used to restrict trade are against my religion. There's no question about that. If you take a mark in you or on you to buy and sell (and working is just another form of business transaction) it is considered evil (or the mark of the beast). Where they try to fool around is they try to decouple the passport from the vax to try to say the vax singular is not the mark; those are one and the same in the end. In the Bible it's two parts that are evil.

Does the vaccine cause a greater harm than the thing it proposes to cure? Circulation mag came out saying populations with low risk are greatly impacted by the vax.

Does the vaccine stop transmission? If not then there is no religious obligation to apply as a greater of two evils choice.

Does the vaccine cause greater harm in those that would otherwise not have any impact from covid? In the circulation article released this week it's noted that there is a greater harm from vaccination for those in the childbearing years 18-50 because the spike proteins cause harm and death.

Does the vaccine cause death? Released from Pfizer they held back in their review of AE of 30000 people 1200 were attributed to deaths. That is against my religious beliefs on the sanctity of life.

Does the vaccine provide immunity? If not it is not necessary to take since you are still able to transmit so being vaccinated does not create a greater good.

Does the vaccine wear off? If it can then it provides no public good remedy since you don't know when it will wear off or if it even worked.

These are just some of my religious examples that if you search for quotes on body autonomy or revelation for the evil of marking for trade you will see many example to help you write your own letter. It's best to write your own as you can then effectively counter their arguments.

Try submitting again as they cannot hold back your submission. Use your time wisely to read and understand the verses you find.

My hope is it works out for you but the best part is you know something is wrong with all of this. Now is the time to find out by researching to known what your heart tells you.

1
canusa65 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm interested in how they denied your religious exemption.

Was it in the level of detail?

Are all religious exemptions being denied at your place of work?

Definitly retain council and have them answer it.

The biggest thing that companies are doing is going on the decision of the human rights Council of Canada's opinion that:

Personal preferences and singular beliefs not protected The OHRC and relevant human rights laws recognize the importance of balancing people’s right to non-discrimination and civil liberties with public health and safety, including the need to address evidence-based risks associated with COVID-19.

Receiving a COVID-19 vaccine is voluntary. At the same time, the OHRC’s position is that a person who chooses not to be vaccinated based on personal preference does not have the right to accommodation under the Code. The OHRC is not aware of any tribunal or court decision that found a singular belief against vaccinations or masks amounted to a creed within the meaning of the Code.

While the Code prohibits discrimination based on creed, personal preferences or singular beliefs do not amount to a creed for the purposes of the Code.

Even if a person could show they were denied a service or employment because of a creed-based belief against vaccinations, the duty to accommodate does not necessarily require they be exempted from vaccine mandates, certification or COVID testing requirements. The duty to accommodate can be limited if it would significantly compromise health and safety amounting to undue hardship – such as during a pandemic.

You will notice that this language has a lot of hedging and try to trick you into believing a decision has been made but in the body of it it has a caveat that formal case decisions have not been tested.

The key is to be against vaccine mandates, not the vaccine itself. The mandate which restricts you from trade is against most religious texts since time began because evil people use invisible fears to control their subjects and marking people (even figuratively) is inherently evil.

There is no clear proof that a pandemic exists. Have them do the work by providing proof that the vaccine treats covid-19 and that the vaccine provides immunity to the disease.

Get a measure of the vaccine in how it helps your own immune system in some immeasurable and waning way. Get them to admit that after a few months it will fail and give exact durations of effectiveness. The question is why is it mandated if each person is different and some may get no benefit from the shot at all while others get a more substantive benefit.

Have them prove in court that vaccinated people do not transmit the disease (they can't).

They cannot provide proof of isolation without a Vero based study for true isolation of the virus. It only exists in modeling (computer simulation) and when tested by introducing monkey kidneys (Vero) which invalidates the tests.

8
canusa65 8 points ago +9 / -1

My brother has received unnamed treatments to solve his covid infections I assume to boost recovery of vaccinated patients since July 2021. He gets every treatment that unvaxd folks do not so no redemsiver or intubation. He has caught covid three times now while in hospital after his recovery turned bad in April after full vaccination. I think each time they pull him back from death it's a high five count. He did lose a leg to clotting though in Oct so there is that. I think hospitals are run by Satan by this point as I think he's become an experiment in how many times they can infect and recover him.

8
canusa65 8 points ago +9 / -1

I guess they don't realise that every six months (currently) they will have to recertify as vaccinated to keep their status. Then they will be considered unvaxed and get fired.

1
canusa65 1 point ago +1 / -0

Good for him. I met a young man today who's brother had a Stroke after his second shot and now can't drive his new truck. He is unvaxd like me and says the gov are a bunch of psycho parasites. There's hope out there yet.

3
canusa65 3 points ago +3 / -0

https://www.bitchute.com/video/9Iw7X5MhoQRT/

Slightly boring but complete review of the vax batches vs adverse reactions distribution. Looks like the bad batches are around 20% to keep the idiots from noticing when their number is up.

5
canusa65 5 points ago +5 / -0

https://www.bitchute.com/video/9Iw7X5MhoQRT/

Take a gamble with your childrens lives. Sooner or later their number will come up right health Canada?

3
canusa65 3 points ago +3 / -0

https://phmpt.org/pfizers-documents/

First two months documentation from Pfizer 'vaccine' rollout use this rate to generate the adverse record counts if you wish. The company knew people were dying from the shot and covered it up (even now these records are only up to Feb 2021 before the real jab push started). The fact the FDA is saying they will need until 2076 to release under FOIA all their documentation on this ongoing tragedy says a lot.

3
canusa65 3 points ago +3 / -0

https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circ.144.suppl_1.10712

Talk about a death cult. People will take poison without researching what it does to them

5
canusa65 5 points ago +5 / -0

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/11/shockingly-insane-cdc-big-pharma-data-show-save-lives-less-50-children-covid-5000-children-will-die-vaccine/

When will our leaders start the trial of Health Canada burocrates since they have known this has been known for months? And pretending that existing conditions are going to protect them is a cover story they are pushing now. It won't work just like the public good Typhus stories didn't work at the Nuremburg trials.

The cure can never be worse than the disease

4
canusa65 4 points ago +4 / -0

How the best horse termination medication works is by the beast having 7 heads using one voice.

The jab works by attacking where a person is most vulnerable. Whatever you have that is non life threatening becomes suddenly very much so.

Also neurological issues are ballooning so watch for picks in MS, alzheimers and associated demylination diseases suddenly cropping up.

https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/datasets/deathsbyvaccinationstatusengland

4
canusa65 4 points ago +4 / -0

The jab works guys it's the test that are wrong. Oh wait we imposed the jab requirements based on those tests no the jab is the problem not the tests. Oh wait we never isolated covid-19 so it's your fault grandma is dying you hockey players since we said the jab doesn't stop transmission but it does help you overcome covid infection better so get the jab or you are killing grandma.

This is all utter nonsense just like our public health departments and anything Trudeau says.

My brother who has been in hospital since December fully jabbed has caught covid three times and almost died. The treatments they gave him since he's double jabbed do not include redemsivir and ventilation (that's for the un-jabbed). He gets the unmentionable drugs and monoclonal antibodies and they have brought him back three times.

But in the process he did lose a leg in Oct to blood clots (probably from the jab)

2
canusa65 2 points ago +3 / -1

Hia actions speak louder than words. He would have been a terrible Prime Minister. Almost as bad as Trudeau if that is humanly possible.

2
canusa65 2 points ago +2 / -0

Liberals often take selfies with relatives who pass away at a wake. My brothers wife had one taken with my mom in the casket because she thought she looked 'amazing'. Sick

11
canusa65 11 points ago +11 / -0

I suspect Mulrooney is just another globalist so he is all for the peons getting the death jab. He had policies like Biden in the late 80s

3
canusa65 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's not misleading, unless you think that the second dose is the "lethal" one.

Any dose can be lethal based on a few days factors. Primarily it's in the administration and preparation where the dose can lead to a bad outcome. Planned incompetence can lead to poor outcome.

IV vs IM administration when aspiration isn't used to confirm a muscular injection is often the first indication of a potential life threatening event.

The second instance is the poor quality mixing of the shots can lead to mixed results for those who trust these shots. By the third shot you are bound to get some of the mix.

Which is why those that done feel the shot can end up with a bad result later.

3
canusa65 3 points ago +3 / -0

Tail end of peak bell curve is a little misleading since second dose rollouts occur in may-june but the curve falls to 100,000 doses shared by 1st/2nd/3rd shot evenly after July. It appears that vaccinations slowed down but they actually just split across the three shots. Death / injury trail shots by a time of effect - 50% occuring within 24hrs; the rest linger for weeks or months.

https://covid19tracker.ca/vaccinationtracker.html

The big push with school children in Canada started late September so that will be a real shock for students getting injuries in October / November.

2
canusa65 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well we are currently under medicalized tyranny so until people wake up in substantial numbers the marxists will just gladly take away any perceived freedoms that are left over time.

The real eye opener is when the boosters are mandated then the duration will shorten until you have to get a shot to enter an establishment instead of a qr code.

People dont realise there is no end to the hypocrisy of liberals. You will be in perpetual lockdown while our leaders fly off on trips because they are essential.

They wont have to be bothered by the proletariat because they will all be too sick and tired and sequestered from life to fight back.

3
canusa65 3 points ago +3 / -0

There used to be all kinds of clubs in London Ontario that had special privileges you just had to be part of the club. Finding the club is the hard part. There used to be one part of the london life crowd that used the security at the front to stop riff raff from getting curious. It's coming again.

3
canusa65 3 points ago +3 / -0

Speakeasy pubs are not the front of the pub. These days you would call them after hours clubs

9
canusa65 9 points ago +10 / -1

But I think the real trick is to never let the jabbies know. They sit in one public part and the healthy folks sit in a secret area around back. I'd have fun designing the secret entrances

15
canusa65 15 points ago +15 / -0

I think their plans are being hindered by the transparency of the kill shot performing poorly. Communism has never been tried on such a grand scale ever but always fails, albeit only after mass genocides and atrocities.

view more: Next ›