At this point, I’m unsure why Peterson doesn’t restrict himself to known good journalists. He has consistently talked about how the national post treated him well. From there, stick with the podcast hosts that have been reasonable. His audience isn’t reading The Times.
I listened to the full audio interview before I knew the article was out. Interviewer seemed compassionate, did a good job, and touched a lot of ground that wasn’t discussed before.
It was quite clear that Peterson is not schizophrenic. It’s also quite clear that he went through multiple traditional paths for treatment before going to Russia and Serbia.
He was at the UofT hospital when they ramped up his medication, declared him schizophrenic, and were planning on doing ECT on him. At this point they withdrew him and flew him overseas
It’s also explained during the interview that schizophrenia emerges early in adulthood, and it’s plain to see by his clarity in the interview that he is not schizophrenic.
At this point, I’m unsure why Peterson doesn’t restrict himself to known good journalists. He has consistently talked about how the national post treated him well. From there, stick with the podcast hosts that have been reasonable. His audience isn’t reading The Times.
"Sedition" would mean going against the interests of the government.
I listened to the full audio interview before I knew the article was out. Interviewer seemed compassionate, did a good job, and touched a lot of ground that wasn’t discussed before.
It was quite clear that Peterson is not schizophrenic. It’s also quite clear that he went through multiple traditional paths for treatment before going to Russia and Serbia.
He was at the UofT hospital when they ramped up his medication, declared him schizophrenic, and were planning on doing ECT on him. At this point they withdrew him and flew him overseas
It’s also explained during the interview that schizophrenia emerges early in adulthood, and it’s plain to see by his clarity in the interview that he is not schizophrenic.