The 'scientific evidence' should be a pre-requisite to enacting health orders, but the government is now using a 'health emergency' as an excuse to be totalitarian dictators.
Lawyer here. There is case law that establishes that the government does not need any evidence to show that a policy decision is effective. Policy is outright banned from judicial interference. Even if there is strong evidence that it doesn't work, it does not matter. Gotta love this country.
The 'scientific evidence' should be a pre-requisite to enacting health orders, but the government is now using a 'health emergency' as an excuse to be totalitarian dictators.
JCCF is doing great work. I suggest donating to them.
Agreed, everything helps. I first heard of them through James Corbett who interviewed one of them.... https://www.corbettreport.com/resisting-canadas-mandatory-traveler-quarantine-solutionswatch/
Lawyer here. There is case law that establishes that the government does not need any evidence to show that a policy decision is effective. Policy is outright banned from judicial interference. Even if there is strong evidence that it doesn't work, it does not matter. Gotta love this country.
I feel sick