Is it the fact that historically there have been two types of vaccines but now there are four (mRNA and viral vector) and Health Canada hasn't updated this page?
Is it the fact that Health Canada recommends that you get your vaccines prior to pregnancy "However, if you are pregnant and need a vaccination, most are considered safe, such as the inactivated ones"?
I really don't get what you're trying to point out here?
Actually I majored in both toxicology and human physiology. It's why I laugh every time someone calls mRNA vaccination "gene therapy". I knew what mRNA was before it was cool. If you'd like to share what you think is going on in that image I might be nice and explain it to you.
Alternatively you can keep grabbing screenshots of random websites, circling random sentences and circlejerking in your echo chamber.
What makes your comment random isn't the site. It's the fact that it makes no obvious point. I can also take a screen shot of a government website, circle a paragraph or two and post it somewhere with a caption saying "OMG LOOK!!!!!!!!!!!"
I was sincere in my original comment. You're pointing to some information but you're being extremely unclear as to what you think it says.
As to the point about mRNA, what you need to understand is that mRNA isn't new or cutting edge biology. We've known about it for decades. It's been over 10 years since I was in university and it was already basic part of any program that required any understanding of molecular biology at all. I can't give you lesson plans but I am the sort of pack rat to keep old text books in my hall closet for 10 years. Enjoy!
If you'd like to see more of the book I might be willing to copy more pages if you ask nicely. I'm also still willing to explain to you what's going on in the webpage you posted. It's really not clear what you're trying to say. Maybe you think government employees should be more on the ball about updating every corner of their websites? I really don't know.
What is it you think you're pointing to?
Is it the fact that historically there have been two types of vaccines but now there are four (mRNA and viral vector) and Health Canada hasn't updated this page?
Is it the fact that Health Canada recommends that you get your vaccines prior to pregnancy "However, if you are pregnant and need a vaccination, most are considered safe, such as the inactivated ones"?
I really don't get what you're trying to point out here?
Actually I majored in both toxicology and human physiology. It's why I laugh every time someone calls mRNA vaccination "gene therapy". I knew what mRNA was before it was cool. If you'd like to share what you think is going on in that image I might be nice and explain it to you.
Alternatively you can keep grabbing screenshots of random websites, circling random sentences and circlejerking in your echo chamber.
What makes your comment random isn't the site. It's the fact that it makes no obvious point. I can also take a screen shot of a government website, circle a paragraph or two and post it somewhere with a caption saying "OMG LOOK!!!!!!!!!!!" I was sincere in my original comment. You're pointing to some information but you're being extremely unclear as to what you think it says.
As to the point about mRNA, what you need to understand is that mRNA isn't new or cutting edge biology. We've known about it for decades. It's been over 10 years since I was in university and it was already basic part of any program that required any understanding of molecular biology at all. I can't give you lesson plans but I am the sort of pack rat to keep old text books in my hall closet for 10 years. Enjoy!
https://ibb.co/gRRxJqh
https://ibb.co/dBnqhDs
If you'd like to see more of the book I might be willing to copy more pages if you ask nicely. I'm also still willing to explain to you what's going on in the webpage you posted. It's really not clear what you're trying to say. Maybe you think government employees should be more on the ball about updating every corner of their websites? I really don't know.