Okay, you got me. I looked through the first two paragraphs of the first article and saw enough to see that you have no idea what it was you posted. You just found something that used RNA and gene in the same sentence and concluded that it meant you were right. You can still flip through the entire thing and see that no where does it say anything about mRNA being a gene.
If you'd like to try to explain what you think a "gene" is and why it's accurate to describe mRNA as a gene I'm open to listening. If you would instead like to focus on poor word choices all you're doing is showing that you have no idea what you're talking about.
Okay, you got me. I looked through the first two paragraphs of the first article and saw enough to see that you have no idea what it was you posted. You just found something that used RNA and gene in the same sentence and concluded that it meant you were right. You can still flip through the entire thing and see that no where does it say anything about mRNA being a gene.
If you'd like to try to explain what you think a "gene" is and why it's accurate to describe mRNA as a gene I'm open to listening. If you would instead like to focus on poor word choices all you're doing is showing that you have no idea what you're talking about.