To shut down an opponent this brazenly, you would think they are scared of what he has to say.
This is about stopping the PPC shaving any more points off of the CPC. Showing voters the PPC's true colours is a good way of stopping the bleeding of any more support to them.
Why would they take donation money to do so?
How else are they supposed top fund this? Campaign activities are funded by donations. That's how this works.
Say what you want about him and the PPC
Ok. What Kinsella and the CPC say about the PPC is true. One only has to look at the PPC userbase's comment voting patterns around here to know that.
I'm not pearl clutching, as you put it. I am thinking as to why they would do it.
If Max and his followers as as off putting and rude as your collection of posts would suggest, let him debate on the grand stage without funding a secret project to slander him, and let his followers speak for the party.
It is in the political ring where ideologies go to die or thrive. How are they supposed t do that when they can not even get on the first step?
So, they used my donation to shutdown an opponent that risks giving Trudeau another majority?
Sounds like money well spent!
To shut down an opponent this brazenly, you would think they are scared of what he has to say. Why would they take donation money to do so?
Say what you want about him and the PPC, but I would rather the CPC debate their oppositions then covertly shut them down. It's scummy.
This is about stopping the PPC shaving any more points off of the CPC. Showing voters the PPC's true colours is a good way of stopping the bleeding of any more support to them.
How else are they supposed top fund this? Campaign activities are funded by donations. That's how this works.
Ok. What Kinsella and the CPC say about the PPC is true. One only has to look at the PPC userbase's comment voting patterns around here to know that.
https://i.imgur.com/cM45Agm.png https://i.imgur.com/cM45Agm.png
So you can quit clutching your pearls crying "slander!". You're not fooling anybody.
I'm not pearl clutching, as you put it. I am thinking as to why they would do it.
If Max and his followers as as off putting and rude as your collection of posts would suggest, let him debate on the grand stage without funding a secret project to slander him, and let his followers speak for the party.
It is in the political ring where ideologies go to die or thrive. How are they supposed t do that when they can not even get on the first step?
Why would the CPC take measures to stop bleeding support to the PPC? Seriously?
It's not slander if it's true.
Unfortunately for Max, his followers do speak for the party.