I'm a bit suspicious about the whole "mass graves" thing. Back then, if there really was a mass genocide, the organizations could've just burned the bodies and destroyed the evidence. Why would they go through the trouble of burying people, if they didn't really care?
I'm a bit suspicious about the whole "mass graves" thing. Back then, if there really was a mass genocide, the organizations could've just burned the bodies and destroyed the evidence. Why would they go through the trouble of burying people, if they didn't really care?
I put it in "quotation marks" because I know these weren't mass graves. If anything, they were marked with a wooden cross that decayed over time.