Democracy isn't the problem. The problem is that democracy needs to be accompanied by the rule of law in order to work properly I.E. you need a set of laws that can't be ignored by the government or commuted on a whim. That's what we do wrong but the US does right. Their Bill of Rights is inalienable whereas our Charter is just a nonbinding set of suggestions that don't really restrict the government at all.
There is no democracy when people on one side of the discussion are censored.
Democracy isn't the problem. The problem is that democracy needs to be accompanied by the rule of law in order to work properly I.E. you need a set of laws that can't be ignored by the government or commuted on a whim. That's what we do wrong but the US does right. Their Bill of Rights is inalienable whereas our Charter is just a nonbinding set of suggestions that don't really restrict the government at all.
I think you're missing my point: We don't even have the piece of paper.