The OHRC's harmonization double-speak on the non-right to not be vaccinated.
(media.omegacanada.win)
Comments (9)
sorted by:
So it's voluntary but it's not at the same time.
You don't have to take the vaccine but you'll starve to death if you don't.
I thought that the who purpose of human rights codes was to protect "personal preference" and "singular belief" in a so-called free society.
Isn't gender identity a singularly held belief?
I mean you are pretending to have a female penis / male vagina
Yes.
Significantly compromise health and safety? Well, people that get the virus have an over 99% survival rate. I won’t call being unvaxxed something that significantly compromises health and safety especially since the vaxxed can also get infected and sick and transmit the virus.
With any of these religious / creed based positions - the individual needs to narrow their own belief time span window.
"Since believing my truths I have not ... " - set the window time span to last month / last year / last time after you had medical treatments.
That way you protect your position from "have you ever" and you respond "since adopting my personnel creed I have not"