Feudal Canada: A Call To Action
(www.feudal.ca)
Comments (8)
sorted by:
Any thoughts or feedback? This project is new and experimental. It's still being shaped and could really use feedback from Canadians as it's for Canadians. Thanks for checking it out, cheers!
I'll give you some feedback:
I disagree with your opening statement. Part of the problem right now is that many people are seeking to maximize intersectionality points in order to get positive feedback from like-minded communities rather than promote profit in Canada. They are usually doing this at the expense of profit.
Inequality is not the issue. Injustice is the issue. Inequality being front-and-center has a leftist bias to it because that is their doctrine which they promote. Just inequality is fair but unjust equality is not. That is the biggest issue going on in our society.
Your comments regarding lack of affordability and opportunities thus leaving friends, family, communities doesn't make intuitive sense. If where you lived was affordable for your parents to raise you such that you formed friends and a bond within your community then why is it not affordable for you and why are there no opportunities for you? You insinuate the reason is lack of resources but the ultimate root issue is not that people can't afford things because of housing and cost of living, it's that people are choosing career prestige and materialism over family, friends and community.
Canada is not divided by the haves and have-nots. It is divided by the dos and do nots but it isn't even divided by this either. Most of the division going on in society is subversion of christian morality/values in order to promote wage slavery. We have a bunch of children who think there is no such thing as immoral behavior rebelling against what they perceive as restrictions on their individual freedom without the wisdom to understand the emotional consequences of their decisions. To teach people to see themselves has having or not having in regards to money/wealth is precisely the kind of thinking that never ends in well. People should be seeking love and family not materialism. Canada provides more than enough for anyone to find love/family if people would only accept moral behaviors that lead to this outcome instead of constantly trying to fill a hallow void through their constant desire for more of things that don't truly matter.
Your message is a typical centrist message. You believe yourself as trying to bridge the chaos and division between competing forces in society in order to promote some sort of consensus which will pave a better path forward. While this seems honourable, it lacks true understanding of what is going on.
The path to a better society for Canadians is quite clear:
We must promote liberty, justice, individualism, capitalism, Christian morality, and family values. If everyone embraced this, much of the perceived problems of today would vanish. This needs to be done at the educational level. A complete overhaul of the public education curriculum needs to be enacted at a federal level with the mandate to completely abolish public education within 20.
Solutions from the government include:
Closing the borders; decoupling from China entirely; a complete ban on foreign funding to any social cause. Foreign funds must only promote industrial projects not philosophy or culture; multi-payer healthcare system; reducing taxes, especially payroll and income taxes; reduce social spending, especially in education and any non-value add welfare spending; balancing the budget; reducing government regulations and subsidies in all industries, especially telecommunications, banking, agriculture, O&G and construction; all government laws surrounding class, race, gender and sexual orientation to be removed entirely from the books. Rip-up the charter of rights and freedoms; ending the Indian act and assimilating indigenous people into Canadian culture; Removal of gay marriage
With the education overhauled to promote entrepreneurship, personal accountability, christian morality, two gender roles, capitalism and the pursuit of liberty and justice after a couple generations, along with closing the border and decoupling from foreign funds subverting our culture's morality we would see much more unity and the quality of life of our citizens would rise immensely. Pretty much everything you think is a problem in society can be fixed by these suggestions.
You can't find a middle-ground with someone who's political ideology is to be perpetually unsatisfied with everything because they see the world through specific lenses that have perpetual power imbalances and inequality. Not to mention how when you gain your power from a position of playing the victim (a position of weakness) then you will always try to maintain that air of weakness instead of admitting your strength because to do the latter gives up the moral grandstand position you've taken to promote your philosophy. The people you're trying to compromise with are people who will never be happy because they aren't happy with themselves because they've been taught to view everything as a conflict and promote values which are simply not congruent with who they truly are as individuals.
There is such a thing as good and evil. The right thing and the wrong thing. You can't compromise with evil and people who choose to do the wrong things. Doing so is what led us to this path in the first place.
Indeed, the left's ideology is entirely about power. Here is a quote that essentially describes the left.
“To some people the notion of consciously playing power games – no matter how indirect--seems evil, asocial, a relic of the past. They believe they can opt out of the game by behaving in ways that have nothing to do with power. You must beware of such people, for while they express such opinions outwardly, they are often among the most adept players at power. They utilize strategies that cleverly disguise the nature of the manipulation involved. These types, for example, will often display their weakness and lack of power as a kind of moral virtue. But true powerlessness, without any motive of self-interest, would not publicize its weakness to gain sympathy or respect. Making a show of one’s weakness is actually a very effective strategy, subtle and deceptive, in the game of power.
Another strategy of the supposed nonplayer is to demand equality in every area of life. Everyone must be treated alike, whatever their status and strength. But if to avoid the taint of power, you attempt to treat everyone equally and fairly, you will confront the problem that some people do certain things better than others. Treating everyone equally means ignoring their differences, elevating the less skillful and suppressing those who excel. Again, many of those who behave this way are actually deploying another power strategy, redistributing people’s rewards in a way that they determine.” – Robert Greene
That's basically the left in a nutshell. Any ideology that puts power at its core essence will never lead to happiness and will always be hungry for more power. That is why society must adopt objective morality again if we want to promote unity and happiness in our society. The wisdom from our ancestors for thousands of years should not be ignored. Christian morality is what built the western world and there is much wisdom in the roots of its philosophy and morality. We should adapt Christian morality for the modern era rather than forsake it as the left has done. Doing so would improve society immensely.
I gave your comments a read. I appreciate your opinion, i think we shouldn't close the conversation and tell "no you're wrong and I'm right, period". That's not what I was saying either. I think you discussed some of my points and added some of yours. I really believe the conversation about the topics you brought up, some of which were the same, is a conversation worth continuing.
Beside my preference for secularism, i especially agree with some of what you're saying, the way you put it in your own words
About the rest i can say that my opinion is mostly different from yours but my project is not to have more angry Canadians shout at each others. I'm open to any suggestions, other than political opinion or personal opinions which are good too, but perhaps feedback or suggestions about the project. My aim is to have a place where instead of being segregated and sticking to the right or the left we can come together and tell our stories, then discuss things civilly. Perhaps it sounds impossible, or not needed, and probably very idealistic, but that's my idea. And I'm open to criticism such as yours, i hope that i can hear some more suggestions about it.
There really isn't a middle-ground though.
What does everyone want? Happiness, correct? Why aren't people happy? You seem to think it's money but it's not money. Let me explain:
For someone to be happy they need the following things:
Feeling of inclusiveness within a community of other people who share similar values and acknowledge one's skills and accomplishments
The feeling of growth and self-improvement.
The feeling of being being loved and cared for by another along with the feeling of loving and caring for another.
The feeling of having freedom to pursue the things that will make one happy without being obstructed.
The feeling of being fairly treated in response to one's actions; aka justice.
If you have these things, you will have happiness. Notice no where does it say having a house, or food or whatever. If you have those things above you such as liberty and justice then no one is stopping you from acquiring food, shelter, etc... You have your own power to procure those things and you are not obstructed from procuring them.
The problem with our society is that people are not focusing on the right things to find happiness and the things they are focused on actually lead people down paths that make happiness harder for people to find.
When you for example use the threat of violence of the government to tax someone against their will, you are treating them unjustly while also restricting their freedom. Now they may not be able to put food on their table or find shelter because they are not being treated fairly. A person needs to put in more work to get less from the work they put in.
When you hire based on sex, race, sexual orientation, etc... instead of on competence you are being unjust. This makes it much harder for an individual to feel a sense of acknowledgement for one's skills/accomplishments because they are being ignored in favour of acknowledging another person's sex, race, sexual orientation, etc... It is also unjust so you will feel your contribution is not being properly rewarded.
When we as a society push movements like fat acceptance and any acceptance of clearly negative qualities we are making it much harder for a person to grow and improve because now the metrics by which the culture measures "improvement" are not wired properly. Someone should want to eat health, go to the gym and then gain positive acknowledgment for that but when modeling agencies are now hiring fat ugly people instead, it doesn't reward the right behavior which creates a negative emotion in people who should be feeling happy about their hard work and accomplishments but they aren't because society is unjustly treating them for it by giving the acknowledgement and rewards to people who are making obviously worse decisions.
When you refuse to teach children anything to do with gender roles or worse you teach men to be like women and women to be like men (what is going on right now), eventually what happens is you have a bunch of feminized men and maculinized women; however, men are predominately attracted to feminine women and women are predominately attracted to masculine men so you make it more difficult for both men and women to truly find what it is they are looking for in a partner to fall in love with.
When you give subsidies to poorly run companies in the name of some sort of movement that doesn't promote profit, you are giving incentive to the wrong thing. Honest entrepreneurs feel now at a disadvantage because their competition is being unfairly propped up by funds the government stole. This again doesn't promote the right emotions to be happy. Entrepreneurs aren't being rewarded for growth and there is no justice.
When you create endless amounts of regulation which cements oligopolies in place by stifling competition you are again creating an unjust playing field for commerce which reduces justice in your society.
When you give people money for not contributing to society off the labour of those who do contribute to society against the will of those who contribute you are creating an unjust situation.
By promoting all this injustice in society and putting everyone against one another. Boomer against zoomers. Parents against children. Men against women. Rich against poor. White against black etc... All you're doing is creating division instead of unity and you make it much harder for anyone to find the feeling of community among like-minded individuals that all people seek.
You must promote a society that is just, moral and that works together to promote a unified sense of culture and values but at the same time respects individual freedom. That is not what we have as a society and there is no compromise here. Until the left understands what justice is by understanding that their push for equality is unjust there isn't much to discuss. The left must accept that men and women are different and have different roles to play in society, though either can shift between roles, most men and most women predominately are aligned to one such role and for the sake of love and family children must be taught how to best fulfill this role. Finally, we must promote as a society people who show strength in their contribution to the betterment of themselves, of others and of their society. Those that wish to destroy instead of build, those that wish to take instead of give and those that wish to hate instead of love deserve no recognition from society and they should not be rewarded. The left in their social justice crusade feigns weakness in order to elicit a sympathetic response but they do not have the moral high ground for they use they victim complex to seize power in order to benefit themselves in the name of benefiting others and this kind of immoral behavior tears at the soul no matter how good they think they are, deep down, they know they are ugly and that is why they will never be satisfied because the path they've chosen to act in and reinforce never leads to happiness. This is why there is no compromise.
Also created a Subeddit /r/ofeudalcanada