Is this happening in Brampton? Probably.
(media.omegacanada.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (13)
sorted by:
Whenever you see something like this, it's almost always related to the white girl whoring herself out to score drugs. Or to pay off a drug debt. Pakistani men are not known for being sexually desirable Chadjeets after all. I believe I saw a mini-documentary or something on this in the UK. There was this Pakistani gangster with this white chav thot bobbing her head up and down. What happens is these Pakistani drug dealers sell drugs to these white thots (many of them runaways, minors, runaway minors, etc.) and get them hooked on them. And then when the thot runs out of money, the Pakistani offers to "barter" drugs in exchange for sex. Or the Pakistani, BBC, etc. often takes on a second job as a pimp and pimps them out until they pay their tab. The pimps will often take away their indebted ho's phone until she pays off her drug debt so that their ho can't snitch on them to police, call family to come get them, etc.
A lot of pimps are actually also drug dealers and a lot of drug dealers are also pimps. And a lot of prostitutes are actually really drug addicts who are in debt to their drug dealer-pimp.
Even a lot of the independent escorts blow a huge chunk of their cash on drugs instead of doing the smart thing and saving their money (as they won't remain young and hot forever).
A lot of escorts in Toronto put down in their ad "no black men" because their black pimp doesn't want other pimps (in Toronto, pimps are mostly black) to steal their bitch. Because that bitch owes him money for the previous drugs she consumed.
Get the fuck out of here with facts and logic! Drug trafficking is a victimless crime!
I'm actually torn on the subject of recreational drugs. I have a live and let live attitude towards life. Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. But it is also very painful for me to watch people ruin their lives due to drug addiction. And then you have to draw the line somewhere as to how much interference from the state is necessary. And it's very difficult for bureaucrats to draw that line. I like to err on the side of liberty, allowing people to make bad decisions in their life. And punishing them if their bad decisions impact others (ie. meth heads robbing people so that they can score more meth). But I understand both sides. I have nieces. I know I wouldn't want them addicted to heroin and sucking cock to pay off their drug debts.