I defended this doctor in a previous post. My reasoning was, that as a doctor, i should lean towards trust than mistrust while remaining open minded and skeptical.
Her credibility has been pretty seriously damaged with all of these past claims coming out. She demonstrates illogical and frightening beliefs as a practicing doctor.
All that said, I still support her criticism of clinical studies being funded by vested interests that have an interest in the outcome of the study.
Yep. I see the media attack this particular woman's credibility, ignore the crux of whole organizations' grievances, then call it debunked. That's rushing to conclusions to shut down debate.
I defended this doctor in a previous post. My reasoning was, that as a doctor, i should lean towards trust than mistrust while remaining open minded and skeptical.
Her credibility has been pretty seriously damaged with all of these past claims coming out. She demonstrates illogical and frightening beliefs as a practicing doctor.
All that said, I still support her criticism of clinical studies being funded by vested interests that have an interest in the outcome of the study.
Yep. I see the media attack this particular woman's credibility, ignore the crux of whole organizations' grievances, then call it debunked. That's rushing to conclusions to shut down debate.