Around 80% of Canada's land is Tundra, Arctic, Semi-Arid, and Sub-Arctic, in other words, inhospitable. The remaining 20% is temperate climate, the hospitable.

We have land, however, most of it is inhospitable.

Therefore, to build more housing, we have to destroy the existing farmland, or parkland.

Don't believe that bullshit nonsense that Canada has a lot of land therefore we need mass immigration.

Our current habitable land is the same size as Mexico, and the population density would be comparable to New Zealand, or Sweden.

If we doubled our population, we would have the same density as Madagascar.

It's such a big ass lie that's perpetuated in schools.

Around 80% of Canada's land is Tundra, Arctic, Semi-Arid, and Sub-Arctic, in other words, inhospitable. The remaining 20% is temperate climate, the hospitable.

We have land, however, most of it is inhospitable.

Therefore, to build more housing, we have to destroy the existing farmland, or parkland.

Don't believe that bullshit nonsense that Canada has a lot of land therefore we need mass immigration.

Our current habitable land is the same size as Mexico, and the population density would be comparable to New Zealand, or Sweden. If we doubled our population, we would have the same density as Lithuania.

Around 80% of Canada's land is Tundra, Arctic, Semi-Arid, and Sub-Arctic. The remaining 20% is temperate climate.

We have land, however, most of it is inhospitable.

Therefore, to build more housing, we have to destroy the existing farmland, or parkland.

Don't believe that bullshit nonsense that Canada has a lot of land therefore we need mass immigration.

Our current habitable land is the same size as Mexico, and the population density would be comparable to New Zealand, or Sweden.