Woody quit, which limits my prerogative to tell the story since he's no longer here to defend himself. So the most concise, factual, objective explanation I can give (since it appears you guys aren't going to stop asking) is:

Woody improperly banned Gunner667 out of anger after an argument the other day. I gave woody a blast of shit (because this has been a recurring problem and a major source of conflict for years - the arguing with users and then frivolously banning them out of anger), a short argument took place, then woody rage quit and deleted his account.

I did not ask him quit. I did not threaten to remove him. The only substantive action I took was to decree that I'd do the banning from now on and for him to stop banning users altogether. That was the end of the discussion.

Woody quit, which limits my prerogative to tell the story since he's no longer here to defend himself. So the most concise, factual, objective explanation I can give (since it appears you guys aren't going to stop asking) is:

Woody improperly banned Gunner667 out of anger after an argument the other day. I gave woody a blast of shit (because this has been a recurring problem and a major source of conflict for years - the arguing with users and then frivolously banning them out of anger), a short argument took place, then woody rage quit and deleted his account.

I did not ask him quit. I did threaten to remove him. The only substantive action I took was to decree that I'd do the banning from now on and for him to stop banning users altogether. That was the end of the discussion.