These courts have previously granted pipelines in the past to numerous landlocked states in Africa and the Middle East.

These disputes weren't about the right to build a pipeline, only about payments. In Alberta's case you have would have countries that would refuse to build a pipeline on their soil and you can't force a country to have a pipeline on their turf. Under the "Right of Access of Landlocked Nations to and From the Sea" landlocked countries have no absolute right of access and are dependent on a bipartisan solution.

These courts have previously granted pipelines in the past to numerous landlocked states in Africa and the Middle East.

These disputes weren't about the right to build a pipeline, only about payments. In Alberta's case you have would have countries that would refuse to build a pipeline on their soil and you can't force a country have a pipeline on their turf. Under the "Right of Access of Landlocked Nations to and From the Sea" landlocked countries have no absolute right of access and are dependent on a bipartisan solution.