But the point is I doubt anyone would truly disagree with anything he's saying about women and men and how they are not supposed to be antagonistic to one another. How one must protect and safeguard while the other must nurture and care for and educate.

Well, the Marxists would want the division, but that's because it's good for their agenda.

As a caveat, without having seen the source for these quotes, I'd wager it was part of his larger agenda, that an individual is essentially a small piece of the state, and it was in pursuit of his larger agenda that he wanted the small pieces to be strong.

They just assume its rambling nonstop about jews and blacks and race.

Bad people can have good ideas (which are unrelated to their bad ideas + bad actions).

Those will generally be lost in history, probably in large part because people don't want to be associated with the bad person in any manner. The risk associated with quoting their good ideas is rather high.

But the point is I doubt anyone would truly disagree with anything he's saying about women and men and how they are not supposed to be antagonistic to one another. How one must protect and safeguard while the other must nurture and care for and educate.

Well, the Marxists would want the division, but that's because it's good for their agenda.

They just assume its rambling nonstop about jews and blacks and race.

Bad people can have good ideas (which are unrelated to their bad ones + bad actions).

Those will generally be lost in history, probably in large part because people don't want to be associated with the bad person in any manner. The risk associated with quoting their good ideas is rather high.