The dictionary definition clearly isn’t the way you define it,

Huh?

https://omegacanada.win/p/12igTWULWm/now-to-clarify-racism-is-against/c/

so why don’t you tell us what is and isn’t acceptable here?

I got a better idea: If you're going to try to retcon this issue into a story about ambiguous racism definitions resulting in innocent people being banned, why don't you show me so much as one example of this happening prior to me making that first "no racism" post?

I'll tell you why nobody's provided a single example of this - because it's never happened. We've never had one complaint about users being wrongly punished due to ambiguous definitions of racism. You know why? Because we (going back to metacanada) have always just quietly removed borderline posts without saying anything and without banning or suspending the users.

So don't try and rewrite history by concocting some bullshit narrative about ambiguous racism definitions. You people never voiced a single concern about that until I said "no racism" in a stickied post, and then you all flipped out. The "But how do you define racism?" rationale is just the best thing you guys could think of to justify having a letdown over being told "no racism". Don't bullshit a bullshitter.

The dictionary definition clearly isn’t the way you define it, Huh?

https://omegacanada.win/p/12igTWULWm/now-to-clarify-racism-is-against/c/

so why don’t you tell us what is and isn’t acceptable here?

I got a better idea: If you're going to try to retcon this issue into a story about ambiguous racism definitions resulting in innocent people being banned, why don't you show me so much as one example of this happening prior to me making that first "no racism" post?

I'll tell you why nobody's provided a single example of this - because it's never happened. We've never had one complaint about users being wrongly punished due to ambiguous definitions of racism. You know why? Because we (going back to metacanada) have always just quietly removed borderline posts without saying anything and without banning or suspending the users.

So don't try and rewrite history by concocting some bullshit narrative about ambiguous racism definitions. You people never voiced a single concern about that until I said "no racism" in a stickied post, and then you all flipped out. The "But how do you define racism?" rationale is just the best thing you guys could think of to justify having a letdown over being told "no racism". Don't bullshit a bullshitter.

If your goal is to try and turn this board upside down because I won't let you post racism, I'm gonna show you the door.

Huh?

https://omegacanada.win/p/12igTWULWm/now-to-clarify-racism-is-against/c/

so why don’t you tell us what is and isn’t acceptable here?

I got a better idea: If you're going to try to retcon this issue into a story about ambiguous racism definitions resulting in innocent people being banned, why don't you show me so much as one example of this happening prior to me making that first "no racism" post?

I'll tell you why nobody's provided a single example of this - because it's never happened. We've never had one complaint about users being wrongly punished due to ambiguous definitions of racism. You know why? Because we (going back to metacanada) have always just quietly removed borderline posts without saying anything and without banning or suspending the users.

So don't try and rewrite history by concocting some bullshit narrative about ambiguous racism definitions. You people never voiced a single concern about that until I said "no racism" in a stickied post, and then you all flipped out. The "But how do you define racism?" rationale is just the best thing you guys could think of to justify having a letdown over being told "no racism". Don't bullshit a bullshitter.