You just implied that the chance of finding remains is pretty much zero

And what is wrong about that? I already showed you that it only takes about 20 years until a human skeleton decomposes to dirt. If these kids died 80 or 100 years ago, the chance that there is anything left of them is pretty much zero.

Now tell me why they are not digging the site.

Give them time. It's the First Nations decision to dig or not to dig. It's a delicate subject to dig up graves of kids.

If they spent the time and money to put them in coffins, maybe there is something more to this story than you think.

Dude, do you really think they weren't buried in a coffin or casket? They would have used a cheap wooden box as coffin back in the days.

No, usually they look for differences in earth density, which shows were digging occurred to the depth of a grave.

Or for faults created by the collapse of coffins when they decay. A wooden box doesn't hold up long under six feet of dirt. It collapses after a few months and creates a fault (which is nothing else than a change in density).

REAL EVIDENCE

You would only accept dead bodies as evidence.

Let's assume that these graves are 80 or 100 years old. They dig them up and find some nails from the coffins, maybe a hairpin and some buttons from clothes. But no indication for an old structure or the remains of dead animals. Everything else is decomposed and long gone. Would that be enough for you?

... and that it could not possibly have happened from Spanish Flu.

I already proved to you why the Spanish Flu couldn't have killed 200 kids at this residential school. FOR THE SIMPLE FACT THAT THE SCHOOL DIDN'T EVEN HOUSE 200 KIDS AT THAT TIME. IT WAS HOME TO ONLY 60 KIDS. Something you choose to ignore.

Do you believe there ARE "REMAINS" of 215 kids buried there?

It depends on how long they are buried there, but it surely points to several decades ago. The chance thus to find bones is pretty much zero. Maybe, as pointed out above, metal objects (nails from the coffins, hairpins) or other material which doesn't deteriorate as fast as organic stuff could be found.

What do you believe is there?

Already told he several comments ago. The graves of First Nations kids. And they didn't die all at once from the Spanish Flu. They died over decades. And as we can easily see how the Catholic Church or the Canadian government at that time treated Frist Nation people, it's easy to count one and one together. Just look at official death records of First Nation kids at residential schools. Often just a number, no name. If there is a name, it's a name given to the kid by the school and not their birth name.

It's not like the Catholic Church never hid bad things they did? Am I right?

What "exactly" was interpreted from GPR?

Do you really think that an company that performs GPR can't distinguish between graves and "an old structure". Those two don't have the same echo.

Show me a link to statement of what they DID interpret on THAT site

https://tkemlups.ca/wp-content/uploads/05-May-27-2021-TteS-MEDIA-RELEASE.pdf

"This past weekend, with the help of a ground penetrating radar specialist, the stark truth of the preliminary findings came to light – the confirmation of the remains of 215 children who were students of the Kamloops Indian Residential School."

And since ground penetrating radars don't pick up bones, you can be sure that they picked up the same thing just like on other sites. Faults (or density changes).

You just implied that the chance of finding remains is pretty much zero

And what is wrong about that? I already showed you that it only takes about 20 years until a human skeleton decomposes to dirt. If these kids died 80 or 100 years ago, the chance that there is anything left of them is pretty much zero.

Now tell me why they are not digging the site.

Give them time. It's the First Nations decision to dig or not to dig. It's a delicate subject to dig up graves of kids.

If they spent the time and money to put them in coffins, maybe there is something more to this story than you think.

Dude, do you really think they weren't buried in a coffin or casket? They would have used a cheap wooden box as coffin back in the days.

No, usually they look for differences in earth density, which shows were digging occurred to the depth of a grave.

Or for faults created by the collapse of coffins when they decay. A wooden box doesn't hold up long under six feet of dirt. It collapses after a few months and creates a fault (which is nothing else than a change in density).

REAL EVIDENCE

You would only accept dead bodies as evidence.

Let's assume that these graves are 80 or 100 years old. They dig them up and find some nails from the coffins, maybe a hairpin and some buttons from clothes. But no indication for an old structure or the remains of dead animals. Everything else is decomposed and long gone. Would that be enough for you?

... and that it could not possibly have happened from Spanish Flu.

I already proved to you why the Spanish Flu couldn't have killed 200 kids at this residential school. FOR THE SIMPLE FACT THAT THE SCHOOL DIDN'T EVEN HOUSE 200 KIDS AT THAT TIME. IT WAS HOME TO ONLY 60 KIDS. Something you choose to ignore.

Do you believe there ARE "REMAINS" of 215 kids buried there?

It depends on how long they are buried there, but it surely points to several decades ago. The chance thus to find bones is pretty much zero. Maybe, as pointed out above, metal objects (nails from the coffins, hairpins) or other material which doesn't deteriorate as fast as organic stuff could be found.

What do you believe is there?

Already told he several comments ago. The graves of First Nations kids. And they didn't die all at once from the Spanish Flu. They died over decades. And as we can easily see how the Catholic Church or the Canadian government at that time treated Frist Nation people, it's easy to count one and one together. Just look at official death records of First Nation kids at residential schools. Often just a number, no name. If there is a name, it's a name given to the kid by the school and not their birth name.

It's not like the Catholic Church never hid bad things they did? Am I right?

What "exactly" was interpreted from GPR?

Do you really think that an company that performs GPR can't distinguish between graves and "an old structure". Those two don't have the same echo.

Show me a link to statement of what they DID interpret on THAT site

https://tkemlups.ca/wp-content/uploads/05-May-27-2021-TteS-MEDIA-RELEASE.pdf

"This past weekend, with the help of a ground penetrating radar specialist, the stark truth of the preliminary findings came to light – the confirmation of the remains of 215 children who were students of the Kamloops Indian Residential School."