I said it before months ago, Sloan was the ideal choice for conservative leadership. Lewis is a second choice. Sloan fits the traditional conservative character, and that's what conservatives are supposed to offer, an alternative to the left-wing liberal globalists. Sloan just needed a better PR team to translate his views in a way softy Canadians can consume.

Canadians are not fond of fire and brimstone, they like to be sugar-coated and honeyed. Instead of saying, for example, mass immigration is a problem, you could just say something like you want to increase immigration requirements to higher standards, naturally if you increase the language requirements the immigration rate would reduce by itself. Our high immigration intake is due to our lower standards compared to other developed nations, we wouldn't be pulling 300,000+ immigrants per year if we required at least intermediate level English (or French), and prioritised bilinguals, or people from allied countries. If we did this you'll see our immigration shift naturally to more European or Western-allied nations. We'd be pulling more people from Europe and a few Westernised Asian countries, you can look at the English proficiency rankings and you'll see that we're attracting less assimilable immigrants.

I said it before months ago, Sloan was the ideal choice for conservative leadership. Lewis is a second choice. Sloan fits the traditional conservative character, and that's what conservatives are supposed to offer, an alternative to the left-wing liberal globalists. Sloan just needed a better PR team to translate his views in a way softy Canadians can consume.

Canadians are not fond of fire and brimstone, they like to be sugar-coated and honeyed. Instead of saying, for example, mass immigration is a problem, you could just say something like you want to increase immigration requirements to higher standards, naturally if you increase the language requirements the immigration rate would reduce by itself. Our high immigration intake is due to our lower standards compared to other developed nations, we wouldn't be pulling 300,000+ immigrants per year if we required at least intermediate level English (or French), and prioritised bilinguals, or people from allied countries. If we did this you'll see our immigration shift naturally to more European or Western-allied nations. We'd be pulling more people from Poland and South Korea, rather than Ethiopia and India, you can look at the English proficiency rankings and you'll see that we're attracting less assimilable immigrants.

I said it before months ago, Sloan was the ideal choice for conservative leadership. Lewis is a second choice. Sloan fits the traditional conservative character, and that's what conservatives are supposed to offer, an alternative to the left-wing liberal globalists. Sloan just needed a better PR team to translate his views in a way softy Canadians can consume.

Canadians are not fond of fire and brimstone, they like to be sugar-coated and honeyed. Instead of saying, for example, mass immigration is a problem, you could just say something like you want to increase immigration requirements to higher standards, naturally if you increase the language requirements the immigration rate would reduce by itself. Our high immigration intake is due to our lower standards compared to other developed nations, we wouldn't be pulling 300,000+ immigrants per year if we required at least intermediate level English (or French), and prioritised bilinguals, or people from allied countries. If we did this you'll see our immigration shift naturally to more European or Western-allied nations. We'd be pulling more people from Poland and South Korea, rather than Ethiopia and India.

I said it before months ago, Sloan was the ideal choice for conservative leadership. Lewis is a second choice. Sloan fits the traditional conservative character, and that's what conservatives are supposed to offer, an alternative to the left-wing liberal globalists. Sloan just needed a better PR team to translate his views in a way softy Canadians can consume.

Canadians are not fond of fire and brimstone, they like to be sugar-coated and honeyed. Instead of saying, for example, mass immigration is a problem, you could just say something like you want to increase immigration requirements to higher standards, naturally if you increase the language requirements the immigration rate would reduce by itself. Our high immigration intake is due to our lower standards compared to other developed nations, we wouldn't be pulling 300,000+ immigrants per year if we required at least intermediate level English (or French), and prioritised bilinguals, or people from allied countries. If we did this you'll see our immigration shift naturally to more European or Western-allied nations.

I said it before months ago, Sloan was the ideal choice for conservative leadership. Lewis is a second choice. Sloan fits the traditional conservative character, and that's what conservatives are supposed to offer, an alternative to the left-wing liberal globalists. Sloan just needed a better PR team to translate his views in a way softy Canadians can consume.

Canadians are not fond of fire and brimstone, they like to be sugar-coated and honeyed. Instead of saying, for example, mass immigration is a problem, you could just say something like you want to increase immigration requirements to higher standards, naturally if you increase the language requirements the immigration rate would reduce by itself. Our high immigration intake is due to our lower standards compared to other developed nations, we wouldn't be pulling 300,000+ immigrants per year if we required at least intermediate level English (or French), and prioritised bilinguals, or people from allied countries.

I said it before months ago, Sloan was the ideal choice for conservative leadership. Lewis is a second choice. Sloan fits the traditional conservative character, and that's what conservatives are supposed to offer, an alternative to the left-wing liberal globalists. Sloan just needed a better PR team to translate his views in a way softy Canadians can consume.

Canadians are not fond of fire and brimstone, they like to be sugarcoated and honeyed. Instead of saying, for example, mass immigration is a problem, you could just say something like you want to increase immigration requirements to higher standards, naturally if you increase the language requirements the immigration rate would reduce by itself. Our high immigration intake is due to our lower standards compared to other developed nations.

I said it before months ago, Sloan was the ideal choice for conservative leadership. Lewis is a second choice. Sloan fits the traditional conservative character, and that's what conservatives are supposed to offer, an alternative to the left-wing liberal globalists. Sloan just needed a better PR team to translate his views in a way softy Canadians can consume.

Canadians are not fond of fire and brimstone, they like to be sugarcoated and honeyed. Instead of saying, for example, mass immigration is a problem, you could just say something like you want to increase immigration requirements to higher standards.

I said it before months ago, Sloan was the ideal choice for conservative leadership. Lewis is a second choice. Sloan fits the traditional conservative character, and that's what conservatives are supposed to offer, an alternative to the left-wing liberal globalists. Sloan just needed a better PR team to translate his views in a way softy Canadians can consume. Canadians are not fond of fire and brimstone, they like to be sugarcoated and honeyed.