Yeah that's the inflated figure.

But even if you take the most conservative figure (Which is something like .072%), the risk from the vaccine is still drastically lower than the risk from the virus.

You guys have to take a step back from the conspiracism on this one. Nobody's trying to kill/sterilize/program you with vaccines. That's crazy.

All we have here is:

• A virus that while seriously overblown in the media and by governments is still moderately dangerous to certain people (killing .072% of the population).

• A vaccine that (like all vaccines) carries a small risk of negative side effects which, in very rare cases, can be fatal. (killing .003% of the population, but removing that 0.72% risk for 90% of recipients).

.072% > .003%. I'm sorry that doesn't support the narrative you subscribe to but that's reality.

If you want to chase a conspiracy, you need to be looking at who knew what about this virus and when. Why did the US government lift the ban on gain of function research none days before trump's inauguration? Why was the US funding that kind of research (which is basically bio-weapon engineering) in China of all places? Why did this virus break out at the very moment soon as the establishment's bullshit impeachment attempt failed to remove Trump from office?

Yeah that's the inflated figure.

But even if you take the most conservative figure (Which is something like .072%), the risk from the vaccine is still drastically lower than the risk from the virus.

You guys have to take a step back from the conspiracism on this one. Nobody's trying to kill/sterilize/program you with vaccines. That's crazy.

All we have here is:

• A virus that while seriously overblown in the media and by governments is still moderately dangerous to certain people (killing .072% of the population).

• A vaccine that (like all vaccines) carries a small risk of negative side effects which, in very rare cases, can be fatal. (killing .072% of the population, but removing that 0.72% risk for 90% of recipients).

.072% > .003%. I'm sorry that doesn't support the narrative you subscribe to but that's reality.

If you want to chase a conspiracy, you need to be looking at who knew what about this virus and when. Why did the US government lift the ban on gain of function research none days before trump's inauguration? Why was the US funding that kind of research (which is basically bio-weapon engineering) in China of all places? Why did this virus break out at the very moment soon as the establishment's bullshit impeachment attempt failed to remove Trump from office?

Yeah that's inflated figure.

But even if you take the most conservative figure (Which is something like .072%), the risk from the vaccine is still drastically lower than the risk from the virus.

You guys have to take a step back from the conspiracism on this one. Nobody's trying to kill/sterilize/program you with vaccines. That's crazy.

All we have here is:

• A virus that while seriously overblown in the media and by governments is still moderately dangerous to certain people (killing .072% of the population).

• A vaccine that (like all vaccines) carries a small risk of negative side effects which, in very rare cases, can be fatal. (killing .072% of the population, but removing that 0.72% risk for 90% of recipients).

.072% > .003%. I'm sorry that doesn't support the narrative you subscribe to but that's reality.

If you want to chase a conspiracy, you need to be looking at who knew what about this virus and when. Why did the US government lift the ban on gain of function research none days before trump's inauguration? Why was the US funding that kind of research (which is basically bio-weapon engineering) in China of all places? Why did this virus break out at the very moment soon as the establishment's bullshit impeachment attempt failed to remove Trump from office?