There's nothing wrong with that. But then you have to start asking why Canadians rely on mass immigration and Muslim birthrates to maintain the population, the government should be investing on the people already here to make it easier to have a family rather than importing more people.

Canadians continue to vote for mass immigration rather than voting for policies that make it easier to have children. France has been able to do this for decades, their birthrate has always been high, they don't rely on mass immigration. It's really a question of policy and culture, children in Canada are seen as a burden rather than an investment into the future.

You can't be pro mass immigration and also pro family creation, funding is limited and the country need to prioritise. Canadians want to have the cake and eat it too, they want mass immigration and they want to be able to afford children. That's not how it works, no such country exists.

There's nothing wrong with that. But then you have to start asking why Canadians rely on mass immigration and Muslim birthrates to maintain the population, the government should be investing on the people already here to make it easier to have a family rather than importing more people.

Canadians continue to vote for mass immigration rather than voting for policies that make it easier to have children. France has been able to do this for decades, their birthrate has always been high, they don't rely on mass immigration. It's really a question of policy and culture, children in Canada are seen as a burden rather than an investment into the future.

There's nothing wrong with that. But then you have to start asking why Canadians rely on mass immigration and Muslim birthrates to maintain the population, the government should be investing on the people already here to make it easier to have a family rather than importing more people.

Canadians continue to vote for mass immigration rather than voting for policies that make it easier to have children.