Well, there's a few mix-ups here in your presentation of the problem.

You say after deficit then lucky to have job. Why did you present your logic like this? Generally speaking, deficits would actually improve employment. The reason for the reduced employment is the government's authority used to implement restrictions on commerce in society. So yes, given the federal government and provincial government shutdowns, we should be lucky to have a job; however, none of our government should have used their authority to do anything. We would have been better off completely ignoring covid-19 instead of doing anything about it.

When the black slave told his fellow slave that he was upset at the oppression and injustice caused to him by his masters, I'm sure another black slave said they were lucky to at least be slaves and have food on their table because some black people were instead killed or had worse quality of lives. This is not sound logic because the only reason the alternative is worse is because the masters make the alternative worse. In reality we are still being oppressed and simply because we have a job isn't any justification to downplay the oppression. Life isn't only about being able to put food on your table.

I don't expect much to come from the deficit. Overall, our quality of life will come down but the government and central bankers are good at spreading this reduction in quality of life among the 99.9% of the population such that most people can't compute/fathom/feel how they are actually being impacted. Make no mistake, this is a huge reduction on our society's overall standard of living but it's going to be costed over the whole society such that your average citizen is incapable of realizing it. The average person these days thinks the reason their quality of life is lower is because we aren't taxing people who are actually contributing value to society enough instead of realizing the reason their quality of life is going down is because they keep voting in measures that make themselves into slaves relying on others to produce for them instead of tearing down barriers that exist so the average person can become the producers of value themselves.

What most people ultimately want is a life that aligns with their capabilities and the marxist/leninist socialist state we've become isn't doing this. Forced equality leads to injustice and this is the biggest problem our society is facing. We're too caught up in equality that we've forgot the basic definition of justice which is getting what you deserve and right now we're oppressing people who have superior capability in order to prop up the less capable which is inherently unjust and leads to unhappiness. Equality is a worthy goal but it must be earned legitimately otherwise, it is unjust.

Well, there's a few mix-ups here in your presentation of the problem.

You say after deficit then lucky to have job. Why did you present your logic like this? Generally speaking, deficits would actually improve employment. The reason for the reduced employment is the government's authority used to implement restrictions on commerce in society. So yes, given the federal government and provincial government shutdowns, we should be lucky to have a job; however, none of our government should have used their authority to do anything. We would have been better off completely ignoring covid-19 instead of doing anything about it.

When the black slave told his fellow slave that he was upset at the oppression and injustice caused to him by his masters, I'm sure another black slave said they were lucky to at least be slaves and have food on their table because some black people were instead killed or had worse quality of lives. This is not sound logic because the only reason the alternative is worse is because the masters make the alternative worse. In reality we are still being oppressed and simply because we have a job isn't any justification to downplay the oppression. Life isn't only about being able to put food on your table.

I don't expect much to come from the deficit. Overall, our quality of life will come down but the government and central bankers are good at spreading this reduction in quality of life among the 99.9% of the population such that most people can't compute/fathom/feel how they are actually being impacted. Make no mistake, this is a huge reduction on our society's overall standard of living but it's going to be costed over the whole society such that your average citizen is incapable of realizing it. The average person these days thinks the reason their quality of life is lower is because we aren't taxing people who are actually contributing value to society enough instead of realizing the reason their quality of life is going down is because they keep voting in measures that make themselves into slaves relying on others to produce for them instead of tearing down barriers that exist so the average person can become the producers of value themselves.

What most people ultimately want is a life that aligns with their capabilities and the marxist/leninist socialist state we've become isn't doing this. Equality leads to injustice and this is the biggest problem our society is facing. We're too caught up in equality that we've forgot the basic definition of justice which is getting what you deserve and right now we're oppressing people who have superior capability in order to prop up the less capable which is inherently unjust and leads to unhappiness. Equality is a worthy goal but it must be earned legitimately otherwise, it is unjust.

Well, there's a few mix-ups here in your presentation of the problem.

You say after deficit then lucky to have job. Why did you present your logic like this? Generally speaking, deficits would actually improve employment. The reason for the reduced employment is the government's authority used to implement restrictions on commerce in society. So yes, given the federal government and provincial government shutdowns, we should be lucky to have a job; however, none of our government should have used their authority to do anything. We would have been better off completely ignoring covid-19 instead of doing anything about it.

When the black slave told his fellow slave that he was upset at the oppression and injustice caused to him by his masters, I'm sure another black slave said they were lucky to at least be slaves and have food on their table because some black people were instead killed or had worse quality of lives. This is not sound logic because the only reason the alternative is worse is because the masters make the alternative worse. In reality we are still being oppressed and simply because we have a job isn't any justification to downplay the oppression. Life isn't only about being able to put food on your table.

I don't expect much to come from the deficit. Overall, our quality of life will come down but the government and central bankers are good at spreading this reduction in quality of life among the 99.9% of the population such that most people can't compute/fathom/feel how they are actually being impacted. Make no mistake, this is a huge reduction on our society's overall standard of living but it's going to be costed over the whole society such that your average citizen is incapable of realizing it. The average person these days thinks the reason their quality of life is lower is because we aren't taxing people who are actually contributing value to society enough instead of realizing the reason their quality of life is going down is because they keep voting in measures that make themselves into slaves relying on others to produce for them instead of tearing down barriers that exist so the average person can become the producers of value themselves.