OK. That doesn't change the stats. 25% are NOT being ignored. Any stats like these will always include an unknown category. It IS normal to draw conclusions from stats with an unknown subset. Or do you do math differently than everyone else trained in stats?
Here's what you wrote, in case you decide to edit it after I've already replied, which is what you've been doing:
Just pointing out that any conclusion drawn from ignoring 25% of the data is going to be shaky.
OK. That doesn't change the stats. 25% are NOT being ignored. Any stats like these will always include an unknown category. It IS normal to drawn conclusions from stats with an unknown subset. Or do you do math differently than everyone else trained in stats?
Here's what you wrote, in case you decide to edit it after I've already replied, which is what you've been doing:
Just pointing out that any conclusion drawn from ignoring 25% of the data is going to be shaky.
OK. That doesn't change the stats. 25% are NOT being ignored. Any stats like these will always include an unknown category. It IS normal to drawn conclusions from stats with an unknown subset. Rr do you do math differently than everyone else trained in stats?
Here's what you wrote, in case you decide to edit it after I've already replied, which is what you've been doing:
Just pointing out that any conclusion drawn from ignoring 25% of the data is going to be shaky.
OK. That doesn't change the stats. 25% are NOT being ignored. Any stats like these will always include an unknown category. It IS normal to drawn conclusions from stats with an unknown subset. Rr do you do math differently than everyone else trained in stats?
Here's what you wrote, in case yo decide to edit it after I've already replied, which is what you've been doing:
Just pointing out that any conclusion drawn from ignoring 25% of the data is going to be shaky.
OK. That doesn't change the stats. 25% are NOT being ignored. Any stats like these will always include an unknown category. It IS normal to drawn conclusions from stats with an unknown subset or do you do math differently than everyone else trained in stats?
Here's what you wrote, in case yo decide to edit it after I've already replied, which is what you've been doing:
Just pointing out that any conclusion drawn from ignoring 25% of the data is going to be shaky.
OK. That doesn't change the stats. 25% are NOT being ignored. Any stats like these will always include an unknown category. It IS normal to drawn conclusions from stats with an unknown subset or do you do math differently than everyone else trained in stats?