Win / OmegaCanada
OmegaCanada
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

nope, sorry, wasn't the current strain so the study doesn't count. I wouldn't want to gain valuable information for suitable analogs.

23% reduction...

i find the '69% risk increase' part of the sentence far more interesting. And what was the study's conclusion exactly?

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: Original

nope, sorry, wasn't the current strain so the study doesn't count. I wouldn't want to gain valuable information for suitable analogs.

23% reduction...

i find the '69% risk increase' part of the sentence far more interesting.

1 year ago
1 score