Uhhh…
Here’s what you wrote:
Jay Bhattacharya, May 24, 2020 "If it’s true that the novel coronavirus would kill millions without shelter-in-place orders and quarantines, then the extraordinary measures being carried out in cities and states around the country are surely justified. But there’s little evidence to confirm that premise—and projections of the death toll could plausibly be orders of magnitude too high." https://www.wsj.com/articles/is-the-coronavirus-as-deadly-as-they-say-11585088464 Global death toll May 2020: 390,000 Global death toll today: 6,800,000
I have to quote you due to your history of editing your comments after I destroy them.
Try to comprehend this line, especially:
Death toll could plausibly be orders of magnitude too high.
Your supposed slam dunk debunk of this is to quote the current death toll.
This is a low intelligence response.
Quote the initial global death toll projections from May, 2020 and then the actual death toll. If the initial death toll is not orders of magnitude too high, then you have a slam dunk.
And I anticipate that you will claim that the projections were halted due in part to lockdowns. Sure, but this still doesn’t debunk The Great Barrington Declaration that holds the position that lockdowns for more harm than good.
Basically, this post is complete nonsense and is a biased opinion of a pro-lockdown extremist.
Uhhh…
Here’s what you wrote:
Jay Bhattacharya, May 24, 2020 "If it’s true that the novel coronavirus would kill millions without shelter-in-place orders and quarantines, then the extraordinary measures being carried out in cities and states around the country are surely justified. But there’s little evidence to confirm that premise—and projections of the death toll could plausibly be orders of magnitude too high." https://www.wsj.com/articles/is-the-coronavirus-as-deadly-as-they-say-11585088464 Global death toll May 2020: 390,000 Global death toll today: 6,800,000
I have to quote you due to your history of editing your comments after I destroy them.
Try to comprehend this line, especially:
Death toll could plausibly be orders of magnitude too high.
Your supposed slam dunk debunk of this is to quote the current death toll.
This is a low intelligence response.
Quote the initial global death toll projections from May, 2020 and then the actual death toll. If the initial death toll is not orders of magnitude too high, then you have a slam dunk.
And I anticipate that you will claim that the projections were halted due in part to lockdowns. Sure, but this still doesn’t debunk The Great Barrington Declaration that holds the position that lockdowns for more harm than good.
Basically, this post is complete nonsense and is a biased opinion that lockdowns are good.