Of course. The paradox of trying to appease the kinds of people who say "cuck".

You can either do what's necessary to earn this tiny fringe's approval as a "non-cuck", and guarantee you get spectacularly blown out in the election.

Or you campaign to win over the sane majority and get called a "cuck" by the fringe for your efforts.

Actually it's not much of a paradox at all. No candidate in their right mind would choose to appease the negligibly small groyper crowd at the expense of alienating the other 99% of Canadians. Why even bother running if that was your plan?

Edit: Ok downvoters, tell me what I've got wrong about this. Explain to me how alienating the mainstream by pandering to a fringe can win an election. Feel free to use the PPC's performance last year as an example.

Of course. The paradox of trying to appease the kinds of people who say "cuck".

You can either do what's necessary to earn this tiny fringe's approval as a "non-cuck", and guarantee you get spectacularly blown out in the election.

Or you campaign to win over the sane majority and get called a "cuck" by the fringe for your efforts.

Actually it's not much of a paradox at all. No candidate in their right mind would choose to appease the negligibly small groyper crowd at the expense of alienating the other 99% of Canadians. Why even bother running if that was your plan?